Post-treatment outcomes of ceftriaxone versus antistaphylococcal penicillins or cefazolin for definitive therapy of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
- PMID: 36800065
- DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04575-z
Post-treatment outcomes of ceftriaxone versus antistaphylococcal penicillins or cefazolin for definitive therapy of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
Abstract
Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is associated with poor outcomes. Ceftriaxone offers logistical advantages over other standard therapies, though in vitro studies have questioned its efficacy and clinical studies of ceftriaxone in MSSA bacteremia are conflicting.We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult patients who received ceftriaxone, cefazolin, or antistaphylococcal penicillins as definitive therapy for MSSA bacteremia from 2018 to 2019. Definitive therapy was defined as the antibiotic used in the outpatient setting. Patients were excluded if they received less than 7 days of outpatient therapy. Follow-up started on the date of definitive therapy completion. The primary outcome was 90-day treatment failure, defined as a composite of mortality and microbiologic recurrence. This was analyzed with multivariable Cox regression. A total of 223 patients were included, 37 (16.6%) of whom received ceftriaxone. The most common ceftriaxone dose was 2 g daily (83.8%). The most common primary site of infection was skin/soft tissue (37.2%), unknown (21.1%), and catheter-related (15.2%). Twenty-six (11.7%) developed infective endocarditis. Median total duration of treatment was 31.0 days, and median outpatient duration was 24.0 days. Twenty-six (11.7%) developed 90-day treatment failure. After adjusting for Charlson comorbidity index, duration of therapy, and use of transesophageal echocardiography, definitive treatment with ceftriaxone was associated with treatment failure (hazard ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.15-6.12; p=0.022). Among patients with MSSA bacteremia, definitive treatment with ceftriaxone was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure within 90 days as compared to cefazolin or antistaphylococcal penicillins.
Keywords: Bloodstream infection; Cefazolin; Ceftriaxone; Oxacillin; Staphylococcus aureus.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Ceftriaxone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia: a matter of dosages?Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Jul;42(7):917-918. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04612-x. Epub 2023 Apr 29. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37119346 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
β-Lactam Therapy for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Comparative Review of Cefazolin versus Antistaphylococcal Penicillins.Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Mar;37(3):346-360. doi: 10.1002/phar.1892. Epub 2017 Feb 7. Pharmacotherapy. 2017. PMID: 28035690 Review.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Ceftriaxone in the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Noninferiority Retrospective Cohort Study.Ann Pharmacother. 2023 Apr;57(4):425-431. doi: 10.1177/10600280221115460. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Ann Pharmacother. 2023. PMID: 35942602
-
Retrospective Evaluation of the Association of Oxacillin MIC on Acute Treatment Outcomes with Cefazolin and Antistaphylococcal Penicillins in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Apr 20;61(4):e0003923. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00039-23. Epub 2023 Mar 29. J Clin Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 36988505 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Cefazolin Versus Nafcillin or Oxacillin for Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections Complicated by Bacteremia: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):100-106. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix287. Clin Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28379314
-
Efficacy and safety of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3418-9. BMC Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 30305037 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Microbiological Profiles after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Exploring the Relationship between Infection, Inflammation, and the Potential Effects of Mechanical Circulatory Support.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 23;13(15):4297. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154297. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124564 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Interpretation of Molecular Test Results in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 27;14(9):915. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14090915. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38732329 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Effectiveness of Continuous Infusion Flucloxacillin in the Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Setting in a UK Hospital: A Service Evaluation.Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Feb 3;13(2):153. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13020153. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38391538 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Ceftriaxone Compared With Cefazolin or Nafcillin/Oxacillin for Outpatient Therapy for Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Results From a Large United States Claims Database.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 12;11(2):ofad662. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad662. eCollection 2024 Feb. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38352150 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Heartbreaking Decisions: The Dogma and Uncertainties of Antimicrobial Therapy in Infective Endocarditis.Pathogens. 2023 May 12;12(5):703. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12050703. Pathogens. 2023. PMID: 37242373 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- van Hal SJ, Jensen SO, Vaska VL, Espedido BA, Paterson DL, Gosbell IB. Predictors of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. [Internet] 2012;25:362–86. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/CMR.05022-11.10.1128/CMR.05022-11
-
- Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ, et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet] 2015 13;132:1435–86. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26373316d.10.1161/CIR.0000000000000296
-
- Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Adults and Children. Clin. Infect. Dis. [Internet] 2011 1;52:e18–55. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/52/3/e18/306145d.10.1093/cid/ciq146
-
- Bidell MR, Patel N, O’Donnell JN. Optimal treatment of MSSA bacteraemias: a meta-analysis of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. [Internet] 2018;73:2643–51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085140d.10.1093/jac/dky259
-
- Eljaaly K, Alshehri S, Erstad BL. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety of antistaphylococcal penicillins compared to cefazolin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. [Internet] 2018;62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29437617d.10.1128/AAC.01816-17
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
