Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 1;46(6):1164-1168.
doi: 10.2337/dc22-2146.

A National Physician Survey of Deintensifying Diabetes Medications for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Affiliations

A National Physician Survey of Deintensifying Diabetes Medications for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Scott J Pilla et al. Diabetes Care. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine physicians' approach to deintensifying (reducing/stopping) or switching hypoglycemia-causing medications for older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Research design and methods: In this national survey, U.S. physicians in general medicine, geriatrics, or endocrinology reported changes they would make to hypoglycemia-causing medications for older adults in three scenarios: good health, HbA1c of 6.3%; complex health, HbA1c of 7.3%; and poor health, HbA1c of 7.7%.

Results: There were 445 eligible respondents (response rate 37.5%). In patient scenarios, 48%, 4%, and 20% of physicians deintensified hypoglycemia-causing medications for patients with good, complex, and poor health, respectively. Overall, 17% of physicians switched medications without significant differences by patient health. One-half of physicians selected HbA1c targets below guideline recommendations for older adults with complex or poor health.

Conclusions: Most U.S. physicians would not deintensify or switch hypoglycemia-causing medications within guideline-recommended HbA1c targets. Physician preference for lower HbA1c targets than guidelines needs to be addressed to optimize deintensification decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Duality of Interest. C.M.B. received honoraria for writing a chapter on multiple chronic conditions for UpToDate and a chapter on falls in older adults for DynaMed. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Physicians’ modifications to sulfonylureas or insulin therapy for patients who reported no hypoglycemia or medication concerns in three clinical scenarios. Scenarios described older adults with type 2 diabetes taking a hypoglycemia-causing medication with HbA1c below guideline-recommended targets. Scenario 1 was a healthy patient with an HbA1c of 6.3% taking glimepiride. Scenario 2 was a patient with complex health and an HbA1c of 7.3% taking insulin glargine. Scenario 3 was a patient with poor health and an HbA1c of 7.7% taking glipizide.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of patient characteristics and preference on physicians’ modifications to sulfonylureas or insulin therapy in clinical scenarios. Shown is the percentage of physicians deintensifying (reducing or stopping), switching, or making no change or increasing the medication in all three clinical scenarios combined. The first bar shows the base case where the patient reported no recent hypoglycemia or medication concerns, followed by each listed variation. Increasing the medication was uncommon (<3%) except where the patient desired tight control (12% increased). Physicians’ actions for mild hypoglycemia (three episodes within the past month of mild symptoms and blood glucose 55–65 mg/dL) and severe hypoglycemia (confusion requiring family assistance) were similar to hypoglycemia causing somnolence resulting in an emergency department visit (data not shown).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Physicians’ selection of HbA1c target for older adults with type 2 diabetes in relation to ADA guidelines. Patients in good, complex, and poor health were described using the language in the ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022 section on older adults (2). Guideline-concordant HbA1c targets were <7.0 to 7.5% (good health), <8.0% (complex health), and <8.5% or no specific target (poor health).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pilla SJ, Schoenborn NL, Maruthur NM, Huang ES. Approaches to risk assessment among older patients with diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2019;19:59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee . 13. Older adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care 2022;45:S195–S207 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oktora MP, Kerr KP, Hak E, Denig P. Rates, determinants and success of implementing deprescribing in people with type 2 diabetes: a scoping review. Diabet Med 2021;38:e14408. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le P, Ayers G, Misra-Hebert AD, et al. . Adherence to the American Diabetes Association’s glycemic goals in the treatment of diabetes among older Americans, 2001–2018. Diabetes Care 2022;45:1107–1115 - PubMed
    1. Seidu S, Kunutsor SK, Topsever P, Hambling CE, Cos FX, Khunti K. Deintensification in older patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of approaches, rates and outcomes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:1668–1679 - PubMed

Publication types