Radiofrequency and Radiofrequency Microneedling in Skin of Color: A Review of Usage, Safety, and Efficacy

Dermatol Surg. 2023 May 1;49(5):489-493. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003733. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) and radiofrequency microneedling (RFM) for rhytides, scarring, and skin rejuvenation are believed to have a lower risk of postprocedural dyspigmentation in darker skin types.

Objective: To explore the safety and efficacy of RF and RFM in Fitzpatrick skin Types III to VI.

Methods and materials: A systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE databases from 2000 to 2021 using combinations of the terms radiofrequency, microneedling, skin of color, and Fitzpatrick was performed. Exclusion criteria included non-Fitzpatrick skin Types III-VI patient population, nonprimary articles, nonskin radiofrequency, and nonhuman studies.

Results: Thirty-five articles addressing the use of RF or RFM in skin of color were identified-22 for skin rejuvenation, 7 for acne scars, 4 for nonacne scars, 1 for hyperpigmentation, and 1 for acne treatment. Seven studies noted transient postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, 1 observed mild prolonged hyperpigmentation, and only 1 study reported permanent scarring.

Conclusion: Radiofrequency and RFM seem to have a low risk of scarring or hyperpigmentation in skin of color. This review demonstrates that these procedures have been successfully used primarily for rhytides, acne scarring, and skin rejuvenation. However, a large proportion of the studies lack strong quality evidence.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Acne Vulgaris* / complications
  • Acne Vulgaris* / therapy
  • Cicatrix / etiology
  • Cicatrix / therapy
  • Cosmetic Techniques* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Hyperpigmentation*
  • Needles
  • Skin Pigmentation
  • Treatment Outcome