A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;307(6):1873-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06993-y. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a special kind of intrauterine balloon (IUB) and that of an intrauterine contraception device (IUD) for patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA).

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, after TCRA, 31 patients received a special IUB, and 38 patients received an IUD. The Fisher exact test, logistic regression method, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for statistical analysis. A two-sided value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The readhesion rate significantly differed between the IUB group and IUD group, at 15.39% and 54.06%, respectively (P = 0.002). For recurrent moderate IUA, patients in the IUB group had lower scores than patients in the IUD group (P = 0.035). There was a significant difference in the intrauterine pregnancy rate of IUA patients in the IUB group and IUD group after treatment, with rates of 55.56% and 14.29%, respectively (P = 0.015).

Conclusion: Patients in the special IUB group had better outcomes than those in the IUD group, which has a certain guiding significance for clinical work.

Keywords: Hysteroscopy; Intrauterine adhesions; Intrauterine contraception device; Special intrauterine balloon.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysteroscopy / methods
  • Intrauterine Devices* / adverse effects
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tissue Adhesions* / etiology
  • Tissue Adhesions* / surgery
  • Uterine Balloon Tamponade*
  • Uterine Diseases* / surgery