Independent reliability and availability analyses of modified classification for migrated lumbar disc herniation

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 14;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03688-7.

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of modified classification system of migrated nucleus pulposus and its clinical application value.

Methods: We retrieved 1000 lumbar MRI of different patients in Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2016 to December 2019 for interpretation, and screened 105 migrated lumbar MRI for inclusion in the study. Three spinal surgeons made classification according to the modified classification method. Two weeks later, the sorting data of the patients were shuffled and the classification was judged by three doctors again. The consistency and repeatability of the improved classification were evaluated by Kappa coefficient. The general data of the included patients were collected. The patients were followed up for 2 years, and the risk factors of surgical treatment of patients with migrated lumbar disc herniation were analyzed. The treatment plan, surgical approach, operation time, VAS score, ODI score and other relevant data of the included patients were collected to evaluate the guiding effect of the classification system on clinical practice.

Results: In this study, the incidence of migrated lumbar disc herniation was about 10.5%, and most of the patients were male. Patients with higher BMI are more likely to develop this disease. Our study confirmed that the modified classification has moderate to high confidence. During the 2-year follow-up period, 66 patients (62.9%) were treated conservatively, and the patients with conservative treatment were mainly A2 and B2 type (59.1%). Thirty-nine patients (37.1%) underwent surgical treatment. The patients recovered well after operation, and the low back pain and ODI index were significantly improved at 1 year after operation (P < 0.05). We suggest that type A1 and B1 migrated nucleus pulposus can be removed by posterior approach. For type A2, B2, C1, C2, the lateral approach is recommended to remove the nucleus pulposus directly. Logistic regression and ROC analysis showed that disease duration (≥ 1 year) and BMI (≥ 24) maybe were risk factors for surgical treatment of patients with migrated lumbar disc herniation.

Conclusion: The modified classification has good reliability. In the current study, the experience level of spine surgeons does not affect the reliability of the classification system. Our study confirmed that this classification has a good reference value for guiding the treatment plan and the choice of surgical approach.

Keywords: Classification; Migrated lumbar disc herniation; Reliability.

MeSH terms

  • Diskectomy, Percutaneous* / methods
  • Endoscopy / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement* / diagnostic imaging
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement* / surgery
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery
  • Male
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome