Racial-Ethnic Composition of Primary Care Practices and Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Initiative Participation
- PMID: 36941423
- PMCID: PMC10593678
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08160-0
Racial-Ethnic Composition of Primary Care Practices and Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Initiative Participation
Abstract
Background: It remains unclear whether the racial-ethnic composition or the socioeconomic profiles of eligible primary care practices better explain practice participation in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) program.
Objective: To examine whether practices serving high proportions of Black or Latino Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries were less likely to participate in CPC+ in 2021 compared to practices serving lower proportions of these populations.
Design: 2019 IQVIA OneKey data on practice characteristics was linked with 2018 CMS claims data and 2021 CMS CPC+ participation data. Medicare FFS beneficiaries were attributed to practices using CMS's primary care attribution method.
Participants: 11,718 primary care practices and 7,264,812 attributed Medicare FFS beneficiaries across 18 eligible regions.
Methods: Multivariable logistic regression models examined whether eligible practices with relatively high shares of Black or Latino Medicare FFS beneficiaries were less likely to participate in CPC+ in 2021, controlling for the clinical and socioeconomic profiles of practices.
Main measures: Proportion of Medicare FFS beneficiaries attributed to each practice that are (1) Latino and (2) Black.
Key results: Of the eligible practices, 26.9% were CPC+ participants. In adjusted analyses, practices with relatively high shares of Black (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 0.62, p < 0.05) and Latino (aOR = 0.32, p < 0.01) beneficiaries were less likely to participate in CPC+ compared to practices with lower shares of these beneficiary groups. State differences in CPC+ participation rates partially explained participation disparities for practices with relatively high shares of Black beneficiaries, but did not explain participation disparities for practices with relatively high shares of Latino beneficiaries.
Conclusions: The racial-ethnic composition of eligible primary care practices is more strongly associated with CPC+ participation than census tract-level poverty. Practice eligibility requirements for CMS-sponsored initiatives should be reconsidered so that Black and Latino beneficiaries are not left out of the benefits of practice transformation.
Keywords: chronic care management; delivery system reform; health systems; independent physicians; primary care practices.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest relevant to the research.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Participation in a Medicare advanced primary care model and the delivery of high-value services.Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58(6):1266-1291. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14213. Epub 2023 Aug 9. Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37557935 Free PMC article.
-
The Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Model and Health Care Spending, Service Use, and Quality.JAMA. 2024 Jan 9;331(2):132-146. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.24712. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 38100460 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Effects of the Comprehensive Primary Care Model on Health Care Spending and Utilization.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1713-1721. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06952-w. Epub 2021 Jul 8. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 34236603 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Meeting MTM Eligibility Criteria Based on Star Ratings Compared with the Medicare Modernization Act.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):97-107. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.97. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018. PMID: 29384031 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Populations Served in Hospital Service Areas With and Without Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Medical Homes.JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182169. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2169. JAMA Netw Open. 2018. PMID: 30646177 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Participation in a Medicare advanced primary care model and the delivery of high-value services.Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58(6):1266-1291. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14213. Epub 2023 Aug 9. Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37557935 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Peikes D. Independent evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): first annual report. Mathematica Policy Research; 2019. https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/i...Accessed 21 Jan 2020.
-
- Peikes D, Dale S, Ghosh A, et al. The Comprehensive Primary Care initiative: effects on spending, quality, patients, and physicians. Health Affairs. 2018;37(6):890-899. 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1678. - PubMed
-
- Peikes, Deborah, N. Independent evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): third annual report. Mathmatica Policy Research; 2021. https://innovation.cms.gov/data-and-reports/2021/cpc-plus-third-anual-ev...Accessed 23 July 2022.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
