doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.3564.
The Supreme Court Is Harming Public Health and the Environment
Affiliations
- PMID: 37000439
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.3564
Item in Clipboard
The Supreme Court Is Harming Public Health and the Environment
JAMA.
.
No abstract available
Plain language summary
This Viewpoint looks back at the US Supreme Court’s 2021 and 2022 terms and forward to the 2023 term and beyond with a focus on decisions that affect health care, public health and safety, environmental policy, and social equity.
Similar articles
-
The Constitution and the Public's Health: The Consequences of the US Supreme Court's Medicaid Decision in NFIB v Sebelius.Public Health Rep. 2016 Nov;131(6):844-846. doi: 10.1177/0033354916670870. Epub 2016 Oct 13. Public Health Rep. 2016. PMID: 28123233 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Public Carry versus Public Health - The Harms to Come from the Supreme Court's Decision in Bruen.N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 6;387(14):1245-1247. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2210269. Epub 2022 Oct 1. N Engl J Med. 2022. PMID: 36193944 No abstract available.
-
The Supreme Court's influence on medicine and health: the Rehnquist Court, 1986-2005.JAMA. 2005 Oct 5;294(13):1685-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.13.1685. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16204668 No abstract available.
-
The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law.Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S129-36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.044727. Am J Public Health. 2005. PMID: 16030328 Review.
-
Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.Gend Med. 2005 Sep;2(3):124-30. doi: 10.1016/s1550-8579(05)80040-3. Gend Med. 2005. PMID: 16290884 Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
