Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;58(5):1024-1034.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14155. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

The impact of Medicaid expansion on spending and utilization by older low-income Medicare beneficiaries

Affiliations

The impact of Medicaid expansion on spending and utilization by older low-income Medicare beneficiaries

Jennifer M Mellor et al. Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To examine indirect spillover effects of Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions to working-age adults on health care coverage, spending, and utilization by older low-income Medicare beneficiaries.

Data sources: 2010-2018 Health and Retirement Study survey data linked to annual Medicare beneficiary summary files.

Study design: We estimated individual-level difference-in-differences models of total spending for inpatient, institutional outpatient, physician/professional provider services; inpatient stays, outpatient visits, physician visits; and Medicaid and Part A and B Medicare coverage. We compared changes in outcomes before and after Medicaid expansion in expansion versus nonexpansion states.

Data collection/extraction methods: The sample included low-income respondents aged 69 and older with linked Medicare data, enrolled in full-year traditional Medicare, and residing in the community.

Principal findings: ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with a 9.8 percentage point increase in Medicaid coverage (95% CI: 0.020-0.176), a 4.4 percentage point increase in having any institutional outpatient spending (95% CI: 0.005-0.083), and a positive but statistically insignificant 2.4 percentage point change in Part B enrollment (95% CI: -0.003 to 0.050, p = 0.079).

Conclusions: ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with more institutional outpatient spending among older low-income Medicare beneficiaries. Increased care costs should be weighed against potential benefits from increased realized access to care.

Keywords: Medicaid; Medicare; access/demand/utilization of services; aging/elderly/geriatrics; health policy/politics/law/regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Event study estimates of relative changes over time in inpatient spending and utilization associated with Medicaid expansion, 2010–2018. Estimated on 2010–2018 Health and Retirement Study respondents who are aged 69 and older, have Medicare data, have full‐year traditional Medicare enrollment, have income at or below 135% of the federal poverty level, live in the community, and live in states that either expanded Medicaid in 2014 or did not expand Medicaid between 2014 and 2018. Weighted coefficients and 95‐percent confidence intervals shown for EXPANSION × 4 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 3 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 2 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × YEAR OF EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 1 YEAR POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 2 YEARS POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 3 YEARS POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 4 YEARS POST EXPANSION. The omitted category is EXPANSION × 1 YEAR PRE EXPANSION. Controls include single year of respondent age, education (less than high school, some college, college or more; the omitted category is high school), sex, race (Black/African American, other race; the omitted category is White), and Hispanic ethnicity (the omitted category is non‐Hispanic), and state and year fixed effects. DV, dependent variable. The p‐values of F‐tests of the joint significance of pre‐trend coefficient estimates are as follows for Figures 1 (A) 0.31; (B) 0.98; (C) 0.18; (D) 0.32.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Event study estimates of relative changes over time in outpatient spending and utilization associated with Medicaid expansion, 2010–2018. Estimated on 2010–2018 Health and Retirement Survey respondents who are aged 69 and older, have Medicare data, have full‐year traditional Medicare enrollment, have income at or below 135% of the federal poverty level, live in the community, and live in states that either expanded Medicaid in 2014 or did not expand Medicaid between 2014 and 2018. Weighted coefficients and 95‐percent confidence intervals shown for EXPANSION × 4 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 3 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 2 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × YEAR OF EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 1 YEAR POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 2 YEARS POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 3 YEARS POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 4 YEARS POST EXPANSION. The omitted category is EXPANSION × 1 YEAR PRE EXPANSION. Controls include single year of respondent age, education (less than high school, some college, college or more; the omitted category is high school), sex, race (Black/African American, other race; the omitted category is White), and Hispanic ethnicity (the omitted category is non‐Hispanic), and state and year fixed effects. DV, dependent variable. The p‐values of F‐tests of the joint significance of pre‐trend coefficient estimates are as follows for Figure 2 (A) 0.85; (B) 0.81; (C) 0.85; (D) 0.87.
FIGURE A1
FIGURE A1
Event study of Medicaid enrollment, 2010–2018. Estimated on 2010–2018 Health and Retirement Study respondents who are aged 69 and older, have Medicare data, have full‐year traditional Medicare enrollment, have income at or below 135% of the federal poverty level, live in the community, and live in states that either expanded Medicaid in 2014 or did not expand Medicaid between 2014 and 2018. Weighted coefficients and 95‐percent confidence intervals shown for EXPANSION × 4 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 3 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 2 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × YEAR OF EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 1 YEAR POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 2 YEARS POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 3 YEARS POST EXPANSION; and EXPANSION × 4 YEARS POST EXPANSION The omitted category is EXPANSION × 1 YEAR PRE EXPANSION. Controls include single year of respondent age, education (less than high school, some college, college or more; the omitted category is high school), sex, race (Black, Other Race; the omitted category is White), and Hispanic ethnicity (the omitted category is non‐Hispanic), and state and year fixed effects. The p‐value for individual interaction terms are 0.007 (year 0), p = 0.66 (year 1), 0.36 (year 2), 0.09 (year 3), and 0.06 (year 4). The p‐value of an F‐test of the joint significance of pre‐trend coefficient estimates is 0.55.
FIGURE A2
FIGURE A2
Event study part B Medicare enrollment, 2010–2018. Estimated on 2010–2018 Health and Retirement Study respondents who are aged 69 and older, have Medicare data, have full‐year traditional Medicare enrollment, have income at or below 135% of the federal poverty level, live in the community, and live in states that either expanded Medicaid in 2014 or did not expand Medicaid between 2014 and 2018. Weighted coefficients and 95‐percent confidence intervals shown for EXPANSION × 4 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 3 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 2 YEARS PRE EXPANSION; EXPANSION × YEAR OF EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 1 YEAR POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 2 YEARS POST EXPANSION; EXPANSION × 3 YEARS POST EXPANSION; and EXPANSION × 4 YEARS POST EXPANSION The omitted category is EXPANSION × 1 YEAR PRE EXPANSION. Controls include single year of respondent age, education (less than high school, some college, college or more; the omitted category is high school), sex, race (Black, Other Race; the omitted category is White), and Hispanic ethnicity (the omitted category is non‐Hispanic), and state and year fixed effects. p‐value for individual interaction terms are 0.30 (year 0), p = 0.34 (year 1), 0.92 (year 2), 0.32 (year 3), and 0.18 (year 4). The p‐value of an F‐test of the joint significance of pre‐trend coefficient estimates is 0.88.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hamersma S, Kim M, Timpe B. The effect of parental Medicaid expansions on children's health insurance coverage. Contem Econ Policy. 2019;37(2):297‐311. doi:10.1111/coep.12392 - DOI
    1. Hudson J, Moriya A. Medicaid expansion for adults had measurable ‘welcome mat’ effects on their children. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(9):1643‐1651. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0347 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kenney GM, Long SK, Luque A. Health reform In Massachusetts cut the uninsurance rate among children in half. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(6):1242‐1247. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0314 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonier J, Boudreaux MH, Blewett LA. Medicaid “welcome‐mat” effect of Affordable Care Act implementation could be substantial. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(7):1319‐1325. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0360 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McInerney M, Mellor JM, Sabik LM. Welcome mats and on‐ramps for older adults: the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansions on dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid. J Policy Anal Manag. 2020;40(1):12‐41. doi:10.1002/pam.22259 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types