Promoting appropriate midline catheter and PICC placement through implementation of an EHR-based clinical decision support tool: An interrupted time-series analysis
- PMID: 37052429
- DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13093
Promoting appropriate midline catheter and PICC placement through implementation of an EHR-based clinical decision support tool: An interrupted time-series analysis
Abstract
Background: Inappropriate use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), including multilumen PICCs, may increase the risk of patient complications.
Objective: Implement computerized decision support to: (a) increase the use of midline catheters over PICCs when appropriate and (b) decrease PICC lumens when a PICC is necessary.
Designs: Quasi-experimental, interrupted time series.
Setting: Single tertiary academic medical center.
Patients: Hospitalized adults who received a midline or PICC during clinical care.
Intervention: Decision support on appropriate vascular access device choice via a set of electronic orders embedded within the electronic health record.
Measurements: Proportion of midline catheter and single-lumen PICCs placed between January 2, 2017 and November 19, 2017 (preintervention) versus November 20, 2017 to December 1, 2019 (postintervention).
Results: A total of 8758 midline and PICCs were inserted during the study period. A statistically significant increase in the insertion of midline catheters was observed during the intervention (p = .006). In parallel, single-lumen PICC insertion as a proportion of all PICCs also increased after the intervention (p = .035). Results were consistent across multiple disciplines, including internal medicine, surgery, and intensive care. After considering the hospital census, total PICC and midline utilization rates and rates of complications did not change over time. However, an increase in catheter exchanges from less to more invasive devices occurred.
Conclusions: In this single-center study, the implementation of electronic decision support to inform appropriate catheter use led to a more appropriate midline catheter and single-lumen PICC insertion. Dissemination of this single, effective intervention to examine efficacy in other hospital settings would be welcomed.
© 2023 Society of Hospital Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Less Lumens-Less Risk: A Pilot Intervention to Increase the Use of Single-Lumen Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters.J Hosp Med. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):42-46. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3097. Epub 2018 Oct 31. J Hosp Med. 2019. PMID: 30379146
-
Safety and Outcomes of Midline Catheters vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters for Patients With Short-term Indications: A Multicenter Study.JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jan 1;182(1):50-58. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6844. JAMA Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 34842905 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35943390
-
Hydrophilic biomaterial intravenous hydrogel catheter for complication reduction in PICC and midline catheters.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2024 Mar;21(3):207-216. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2324885. Epub 2024 Mar 6. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2024. PMID: 38445649 Review.
-
Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients.Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):489-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.489. Chest. 2005. PMID: 16100130 Review.
Cited by
-
Inappropriate Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Pediatrics: A Multisite Study.Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Mar 1;14(3):180-188. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007518. Hosp Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38404202
References
REFERENCES
-
- Donovan MS, Thomas KD, Davis DC, Hawkins K, Harris DS. Peripherally inserted central catheters: placement and use in a family practice hospital. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1996;9(4):235-240.
-
- Chopra V, Anand S, Krein SL, Chenoweth C, Saint S. Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. Am J Med. 2012;125(8):733-741.
-
- Chopra V, Fallouh N, McGuirk H, et al. Patterns, risk factors and treatment associated with PICC-DVT in hospitalized adults: a nested case-control study. Thromb Res. 2015;135(5):829-834.
-
- Chopra V, O'Horo JC, Rogers MAM, Maki DG, Safdar N. The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(9):908-918.
-
- Ratz D, Hofer T, Flanders SA, Saint S, Chopra V. Limiting the number of lumens in peripherally inserted central catheters to improve outcomes and reduce cost: a simulation study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(7):811-817.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
