Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: A systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0278007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278007. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: The delivery of high quality care is a fundamental goal for health systems worldwide. One policy tool to ensure quality is the regulation of services by an independent public authority. This systematic review seeks to identify determinants of compliance with such regulation in health and social care services.

Methods: Searches were carried out on five electronic databases and grey literature sources. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers independently. Determinants were identified from the included studies, extracted and allocated to constructs in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The quality of included studies was appraised by two reviewers independently. The results were synthesised in a narrative review using the constructs of the CFIR as grouping themes.

Results: The search yielded 7,500 articles for screening, of which 157 were included. Most studies were quantitative designs in nursing home settings and were conducted in the United States. Determinants were largely structural in nature and allocated most frequently to the inner and outer setting domains of the CFIR. The following structural characteristics and compliance were found to be positively associated: smaller facilities (measured by bed capacity); higher nurse-staffing levels; and lower staff turnover. A facility's geographic location and compliance was also associated. It was difficult to make findings in respect of process determinants as qualitative studies were sparse, limiting investigation of the processes underlying regulatory compliance.

Conclusion: The literature in this field has focused to date on structural attributes of compliant providers, perhaps because these are easier to measure, and has neglected more complex processes around the implementation of regulatory standards. A number of gaps, particularly in terms of qualitative work, are evident in the literature and further research in this area is needed to provide a clearer picture.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Motivation*
  • Social Support
  • Social Work*
  • United States

Grants and funding

This review comprises part of a PhD study funded by the Health Information and Quality Authority (Ireland). This research was conducted as part of the Structured Population health, Policy and Health-services Research Education (SPHeRE) programme (Grant No. SPHeRE/2019/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.