Primary and secondary angiosarcomas of the liver: a multi-institutional study of 32 cases

Abstract

Angiosarcomas involving the liver can be hepatic primary or metastasis from another anatomic site, which have not been systematically compared. We analyzed a series of liver biopsy or resection specimens carrying a diagnosis of angiosarcoma collected between 2005 and 2022 at 3 tertiary medical centers. The cohort included 32 patients (20 M and 12 F) with a median age of 64 years. Nineteen were primary hepatic angiosarcoma (PHA) and 13 metastatic angiosarcoma to liver (MA). Males were predominant in PHA (15/19, 78%) compared to MA (5/13, 38%, P = .025). There was no age difference between the 2 groups. Five cases had background hepatic cirrhosis, which more likely harbored PHA (4/5, 80%). Multifocality and multiorgan involvement were common in both groups. Tumor size was significantly larger in PHA than in MA (10.4 versus 4.7 cm, P < .01). Histologically, there were no differences in terms of tumor morphology (spindled versus epithelioid) and growth patterns (vasoformative versus solid) between the 2 groups. Immunohistochemically, all tumor cells were positive for CD31 (28/28, 100%) and ERG (18/18, 100%). Molecular analysis in 5 cases demonstrated different mutation profiles involving different genes, including MTOR, PIK3CA, ARID1A, CDKN2A, PTEN, TP53, ATRX, KDR/VEGFR2, and so forth. On follow-up, 30 patients (93%) died of disease, with a median survival of 114 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed PHA and epithelioid morphology to be associated with worse survival (P < .05), while treatment was associated with better survival (P < .001). Our results confirmed that angiosarcoma, particularly PHA, is extremely aggressive. Epithelioid morphology is an adverse prognosticator and may be used for tumor subclassification.

Keywords: Angiosarcoma; Histomorphology; Liver; Metastasis; Prognosis.