Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Apr 19:381:e070730.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070730.

Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Chang Liu  1   2   3 , Giovanni E Ferreira  1   3 , Christina Abdel Shaheed  1   3   4 , Qiuzhe Chen  1   3 , Ian A Harris  5 , Christopher S Bailey  6 , Wilco C Peul  7 , Bart Koes  8 , Chung-Wei Christine Lin  1   3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Chang Liu et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of surgery compared with non-surgical treatment for sciatica.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from database inception to June 2022.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomised controlled trials comparing any surgical treatment with non-surgical treatment, epidural steroid injections, or placebo or sham surgery, in people with sciatica of any duration due to lumbar disc herniation (diagnosed by radiological imaging).

Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers extracted data. Leg pain and disability were the primary outcomes. Adverse events, back pain, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment were the secondary outcomes. Pain and disability scores were converted to a scale of 0 (no pain or disability) to 100 (worst pain or disability). Data were pooled using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and certainty of evidence with the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) framework. Follow-up times were into immediate term (≤six weeks), short term (>six weeks and ≤three months), medium term (>three and <12 months), and long term (at 12 months).

Results: 24 trials were included, half of these investigated the effectiveness of discectomy compared with non-surgical treatment or epidural steroid injections (1711 participants). Very low to low certainty evidence showed that discectomy, compared with non-surgical treatment, reduced leg pain: the effect size was moderate at immediate term (mean difference -12.1 (95% confidence interval -23.6 to -0.5)) and short term (-11.7 (-18.6 to -4.7)), and small at medium term (-6.5 (-11.0 to -2.1)). Negligible effects were noted at long term (-2.3 (-4.5 to -0.2)). For disability, small, negligible, or no effects were found. A similar effect on leg pain was found when comparing discectomy with epidural steroid injections. For disability, a moderate effect was found at short term, but no effect was observed at medium and long term. The risk of any adverse events was similar between discectomy and non-surgical treatment (risk ratio 1.34 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.98)).

Conclusion: Very low to low certainty evidence suggests that discectomy was superior to non-surgical treatment or epidural steroid injections in reducing leg pain and disability in people with sciatica with a surgical indication, but the benefits declined over time. Discectomy might be an option for people with sciatica who feel that the rapid relief offered by discectomy outweighs the risks and costs associated with surgery.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021269997.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years. CSB, WCP, and BK report being involved in trials included in the review,5136 and declare that they were not taking any part in assessing that trial in this review.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Study flow diagram. ICTRP=International Clinical Trials Registry Platform
Fig 2
Fig 2
Mean differences (95% CI) for leg pain in trials assessing the effectiveness of discectomy versus non-surgical treatment. Pain intensity is expressed on a 0-100 scale. Studies are ordered by weight. SE=standard error; CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance
Fig 3
Fig 3
Mean differences (95% CI) for leg pain in trials assessing the effectiveness of discectomy versus non-surgical treatment. Pain intensity is expressed on a 0-100 scale. Studies are ordered by weight. SE=standard error; CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance
Fig 4
Fig 4
Mean differences (95% CI) for disability in trials assessing the effectiveness of discectomy versus non-surgical treatment. Disability is expressed on a 0-100 scale. Studies are ordered by weight. SE=standard error; CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance
Fig 5
Fig 5
Mean differences (95% CI) for disability in trials assessing the effectiveness of discectomy versus non-surgical treatment. Disability is expressed on a 0-100 scale. Studies are ordered by weight. SE=standard error; CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Early surgery for sciatica.
    Schmid AB, Dove L, Ridgway L, Price C. Schmid AB, et al. BMJ. 2023 Apr 19;381:791. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p791. BMJ. 2023. PMID: 37076178 Free PMC article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. . Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA 2006;296:2441-50. 10.1001/jama.296.20.2441 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maslak JP, Jenkins TJ, Weiner JA, et al. . Burden of sciatica on US Medicare recipients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28:e433-9. 10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00174. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Peul WC. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. BMJ 2007;334:1313-7. 10.1136/bmj.39223.428495.BE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ropper AH, Zafonte RD. Sciatica. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1240-8. 10.1056/NEJMra1410151. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benoist M. The natural history of lumbar disc herniation and radiculopathy. Joint Bone Spine 2002;69:155-60. 10.1016/S1297-319X(02)00385-8. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms