The associations between physical activity, health-related quality of life, regimen adherence, and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A cross-sectional study

Prim Care Diabetes. 2023 Aug;17(4):392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

Abstract

Background: Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) display a greater than two-fold higher risk of developing diabetes-related complications compared with their healthy peers and the risk increases markedly as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) increases. The majority of the known factors associated with improved glycemic control in adolescents with T1D are geared toward Western populations. Therefore, this study examined the associations between Physical Activity (PA), Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), and regimen adherence on glycemic control in a Middle Eastern population of adolescents with T1D METHODS: The study utilized a cross-sectional design of Jordanian adolescents (aged 12-18) with T1D (n = 74). Self-reported measures used were the Pediatric Quality of Life-Diabetes Module, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities. HbA1c values were obtained from the medical records. Correlation analyses were conducted using Pearson's and Spearman's correlation tests. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to determine if HRQoL, PA, and regimen adherence predict glycemic control.

Results: Only 14.8 % of the participants demonstrated good glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 7.5 %). Participants with poor control had a statistically significant lower mean PA of MET-minutes/week (3531.9 ± 1356.75 vs. 1619.81 ± 1481.95, p < .001) compared to those with good control. The total sample was found to demonstrate low HRQoL (47.70 ± 10.32). Participants were within the acceptable range of PA (1885.38 ± 1601.13) MET-minutes/week. HbA1c significantly inversely correlated with PA (r = -0.328, p = .010) and regimen adherence (r = -0.299, p = .018). The regression analysis revealed that PA significantly predicted glycemic control (β = -0.367, p < .01) as adherence (β = -0.409, p < .01) and disease duration did (β = 0.444, p < .01).

Conclusion: Better glycemic control was significantly associated with higher PA and regimen adherence levels. The correlation between PA and glycemic control depends highly on the level of regimen adherence or arguably, adherence acts as a buffer in the correlation between PA and glycemic control. There was no significant association between glycemic control and HRQoL.

Keywords: Adolescents; Glycemic control; Physical activity; Quality of life; Regimen adherence; Type 1 diabetes.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Blood Glucose / analysis
  • Child
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1* / diagnosis
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1* / drug therapy
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1* / epidemiology
  • Exercise
  • Glycated Hemoglobin
  • Glycemic Control
  • Humans
  • Quality of Life

Substances

  • Glycated Hemoglobin
  • Blood Glucose