Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: Physical and Sociopsychological Effects, Impact and Satisfaction

Cureus. 2023 Mar 21;15(3):e36484. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36484. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Background Gender dysphoria treatment includes gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). Studies are still lacking on how to characterize its effects and impact on transgender people's lives more effectively. Aim To study the physical and psychological effects of GAHT on transgender individuals, assess its impact on their lives, and rate their overall satisfaction. Methods Participants (n = 114; ages 18-62 years; median age 24.0 (21.0 - 33.0) years) included transgender adults residing in Portugal who were undergoing or had undergone hormonal therapy for at least one uninterrupted year. Participants completed an original questionnaire. For most items, an ordinal Likert-style scale ranging from 0 (worst result) to 6 (best result) was used. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests, including Pearson's chi-squared test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables, with a significance level set at 0.05. Outcomes The outcomes included desired physical changes rating (perception and satisfaction with changes); side effects of GAHT; the sociopsychological impact of GAHT (on self-esteem, body image, psychological wellbeing, social and family relations); overall satisfaction (with treatment results and medical follow-up). Results The changes classified as the most perceptible in those undergoing masculinizing treatment (Group M) were amenorrhea (6 (5.0-6.0) points) and clitoris enlargement (6 (5.0-6.0) points). These were also the ones rated as the most satisfactory (6 (6.0-6.0) points for amenorrhea and 6 (4.0-6.0) points for clitoris enlargement). On those undergoing feminizing therapy (Group F), the alteration voted as the most perceptible was sperm production decrease (6 (2.0-6.0) points), and the ones classified as the most satisfactory were sperm production decrease (6 (4.0-6.0) points) and spontaneous erections decrease (6 (5.0-6.0) points). Side effects were reported by 89.7% of Group M (mood swings were the most common) and 96.3% of Group F (decreased libido was the most frequent). The sociopsychological impact of hormonal treatment was significantly positive in all analyzed variables (p<0.001). Overall satisfaction with treatment results and medical follow-up were rated with 5 points and 4.5 points, respectively. Clinical implications This study provides clinicians with more evidence that GAHT may improve the physical, psychological and social health of transgender people seeking medical transition. Strengths and limitations The strengths of the current study include a high participant count relative to the target population, the acquisition of data on previously unexplored variables, and the significance of being one of the few investigations of its kind conducted in Portugal. However, the study has limitations, including differences in participant characteristics, a small sample size for some variables, potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study, individualized treatment regimens, and the inclusion of participants from different countries, which limit the generalization of the results. Conclusions This study provides further evidence that GAHT is effective, and that its physical effects are satisfactory while resulting in mostly non-severe nor life-threatening side effects. GAHT is an important therapy in gender dysphoria and has consistent results in improving numerous sociopsychological variables.

Keywords: effects; gender-affirming hormone therapy; impact; satisfaction; transgender.