Support for Use of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Communication Items Among Seriously Ill Patients
- PMID: 37093298
- PMCID: PMC10623076
- DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0572
Support for Use of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Communication Items Among Seriously Ill Patients
Abstract
Background: High-quality doctor-patient communication is essential for patients with serious illnesses. The reliability and validity of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) communication items among these patients are unknown. Methods: Five CAHPS communication items, a 4-item Advance Care Planning (ACP) engagement scale, 5-item confidence in others' knowledge of ACP medical wishes scale, and a question about confidence in filling out ACP-related medical forms were administered to 1100 patients (20% response rate) with serious illness receiving primary care at three University of California Health Systems. Results: Average age was 69 (range 22-102); 52% male, 18% Hispanic, 9% Asian, and 7% Black; 24% had high school or less education. Eigenvalues and internal consistency reliability (0.88) supported a 5-item communication scale. Item characteristic curves showed a monotonic relationship of response options with the communication score. Item thresholds indicated that most patients reported positive patient experiences (i.e., items were negatively skewed). Item slopes ranging from 2.52 to 5.10 confirmed that all items were strongly related to the communication score. Information (reliability) of the communication scale was higher for assessing patients with negative experiences of care than for the positive end of the spectrum. Communication was positively correlated with confidence in other's knowledge of ACP medical wishes (r = 0.32, p < 0.0001), ACP engagement (r = 0.14, p < 0.0001), and confidence in filling out ACP-related medical forms (r = 0.09, p = 0.0022). Conclusions: These findings support the use of CAHPS survey items to assess communication among patients with serious illnesses in primary care. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04012749.
Keywords: CAHPS®; advance care planning; communication; survey.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Development and evaluation of CAHPS survey items assessing how well healthcare providers address health literacy.Med Care. 2012 Sep;50(9 Suppl 2):S3-11. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182652482. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 22895227 Free PMC article.
-
The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) cultural competence (CC) item set.Med Care. 2012 Sep;50(9 Suppl 2):S22-31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318263134b. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 22895226 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey.Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S28-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 23064274 Free PMC article.
-
Development and evaluation of the CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey for in-center hemodialysis patients.Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Nov;64(5):753-60. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jul 3. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014. PMID: 24998035 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Japanese version of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Examination of its reliability and validity.Palliat Support Care. 2021 Jun;19(3):341-347. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520001108. Palliat Support Care. 2021. PMID: 33118902
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
