Comparative adherence trajectories of oral disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis
- PMID: 37157135
- DOI: 10.1002/phar.2810
Comparative adherence trajectories of oral disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis
Erratum in
-
Correction to "Comparative adherence trajectories of oral disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis".Pharmacotherapy. 2024 Sep;44(9):753. doi: 10.1002/phar.2846. Epub 2023 Aug 21. Pharmacotherapy. 2024. PMID: 37602980 No abstract available.
Abstract
Study objective: This study compared the adherence trajectories of fingolimod (FIN), teriflunomide (TER), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) users with multiple sclerosis (MS) as there is limited evidence regarding the comparative adherence patterns of different oral disease-modifying agents (DMAs).
Design: A retrospective cohort study DATA SOURCE: 2015-2019 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Database.
Patients: Adults (≥18 years) with MS (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10-Clinical Modification [CM]:340/G35) diagnosis and ≥1 DMA prescription.
Intervention: Incident FIN-, TER-, or DMF use based on the index DMA with 1 year of washout period.
Measurements: The DMA adherence trajectories based on the proportion of days covered (PDC) were examined using the Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) one year after the treatment initiation. Generalized boosting models (GBM)-based inverse probability treatment weights (IPTW) were incorporated in multinomial logistic regression to assess the comparative adherence trajectories across oral DMAs with FIN group as a reference category.
Measurements and main results: The study cohort consisted of 1913 patients with MS who were initiated with FIN (24.2%, n = 462), TER (24.0%, n = 458), and DMF (51.9%, n = 993) during 2016-2018. The adherence rate (PDC ≥ 0.8) among FIN, TER, and DMF users was found to be 70.8% (n = 327), 59.6% (n = 273), and 61.0% (n = 606), respectively. The GBTM grouped patients into three adherence trajectories: Complete Adherers-59.1%, Slow Decliners-22.6%, and Rapid Discontinuers-18.3%. The multinomial logistic regression model involving GBM-based IPTW revealed that DMF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.57-3.42) and TER (aOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.62-3.88) users had higher odds to be rapid discontinuers relative to FIN users. In addition, TER users were more likely (aOR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.06-2.13) to be slow decliners compared with FIN users.
Conclusion: Teriflunomide and DMF were associated with poorer adherence trajectories than FIN. More research is needed to evaluate the clinical implications of these adherence trajectories of oral DMAs to optimize the management of MS.
Keywords: adherence; multiple sclerosis; real-world evidence; treatment pattern.
© 2023 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Association of oral disease-modifying agents and their adherence trajectories with annual relapses in multiple sclerosis.Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 May;85:105539. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105539. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024. PMID: 38574721
-
Comparative Adherence Trajectories of Oral Fingolimod and Injectable Disease Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Nov 4;14:2187-2199. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S270557. eCollection 2020. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020. PMID: 33177813 Free PMC article.
-
Real-World Adherence and Persistence to Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Over 1 Year.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):844-852. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.8.844. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017. PMID: 28737986 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Apr;16(4):38. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0639-4. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016. PMID: 26944956 Review.
-
Oral agents in multiple sclerosis.Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem. 2015;14(1):15-25. doi: 10.2174/1871523014999150415130224. Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem. 2015. PMID: 25924620 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Comi G, Radaelli M, Soelberg SP. Evolving concepts in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2017;389(10076):1347-1356. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32388-1
-
- English C, Aloi JJ. New FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2015;37(4):691-715. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.001
-
- Järvinen E, Holmberg M, Sumelahti ML. Injectable disease modifying agents in multiple sclerosis: pattern of medication use and clinical effectiveness. Neurol Int. 2016;8(3):6513. doi:10.4081/ni.2016.6513
-
- Scolding N, Barnes D, Cader S, et al. Association of British Neurologists: revised (2015) guidelines for prescribing disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis. Pract Neurol. 2015;15(4):273-279. doi:10.1136/practneurol-2015-001139
-
- Earla JR, Paranjpe R, Kachru N, Hutton GJ, Aparasu RR. Use of disease modifying agents in patients with multiple sclerosis: analysis of ten years of national data. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(12):1670-1676. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.016
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
