Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to severe shortages of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). As a result, extended use, limited reuse, and FFR decontamination have been utilized to extend the life of single-use FFRs. Although some studies have raised concerns that reuse could affect the FFR's ability to form a seal, no comprehensive literature review of the effect of extended use or limited reuse on FFR seal exists.
Objective: The goal of this review was to assess the effect of extended use and reuse on respirator fit, with and without decontamination.
Methods: Searches of PubMed and Medrxiv yielded 24 papers that included assessment of fit after extended use or limited reuse on a human. One additional handpicked paper was added.
Results: Studies report a wide variation in the number of donnings and doffings before fit failure between different models of respirators. Additionally, while seal checks lack sufficient sensitivity to reliably detect fit failures, individuals who failed fit testing were often able to pass subsequent tests by re-positioning the respirator. Even with failure, respirators often maintained a substantially higher level of fit than a surgical mask, so they may still provide a level of protection in crisis settings.
Conclusion: Based on currently available data, this literature review was unable to establish a consensus regarding the amount of time a respirator can be worn or the number of uses before fit failure will occur. Furthermore, variations in reuses before fit failure between different models of N95 respirators limit the ability to offer a comprehensive recommendation of greater than one reuse or a specific amount of wear time.
Keywords: Continuous Use; Coronavirus (COVID-19); Decontamination; Filtering Facepiece Respirator (FFR); Limited Reuse; Mask; N95 Respirator; Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).