Quality of anesthetist communication with surgical patients in the perioperative setting: a survey at an academic tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia

Yophtahe Woldegerima Berhe; Temesgen Agegnehu; Mulualem Endeshaw; Nurhusen Riskey; Getasew Kassaw

doi:10.1186/s13037-023-00361-0

Quality of anesthetist communication with surgical patients in the perioperative setting: a survey at an academic tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia

Patient Saf Surg. 2023 May 19;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00361-0.

Authors

Yophtahe Woldegerima Berhe¹, Temesgen Agegnehu², Mulualem Endeshaw³, Nurhusen Riskey³, Getasew Kassaw⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Anesthesia, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. yophtii@gmail.com.
² Department of Surgery, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
³ Department of Anesthesia, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
⁴ Department of Internal Medicine, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Abstract

Background: Effective communication is a fundamental step in providing best medical care and recognized as vital component of clinical anesthesia practice. Poor communication adversely affects patients' safety and outcome. The objective of this study was to investigate the quality of anesthetist communication from patients' perspectives at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UoGCSH), Northwest Ethiopia.

Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 423 surgical patients from April 1, - May 30, 2021. Perioperative patient-anesthetist communication (PPAC) was measured by using 15-items Communication Assessment Tool graded by 5-points Likert scale. Data collection was executed during postoperative time as the patients were optimally recovered from anesthesia. The collected data were cleaned and descriptive analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 400 (94.6% response rate) patients included and 226 (56.7%) were female. The median (IQR) age was 30 (25 - 40) years. Three-hundreds and sixty-one (90.3%) patients had reported good PPAC and 39 (9.8%) reported poor PPAC. The median (IQR) of PPAC scores was 53.0 (48.0 - 57.0) and range from 27 to 69. Highest mean score was observed for the item "Talked in terms I could understand" (4.3 ± 0.7). Lowest mean scores were observed for the item "Checked to be sure I understood everything" (1.9 ± 0.9). Patients who had underwent emergency surgery, no previous anesthetic exposure, had significant preoperative anxiety, no history of previous hospital admission, and moderate-severe preoperative pain were found to have poor PPAC compared to their counterparts in the proportions of 82.1%, 79.5%, 69.2%, 64.1%, and 59.0% respectively.

Conclusions: There was good PPAC in our hospital from patients' perspective. However, there should be improvements in checking the degree of understanding of the delivered information, encouraging to question, disclosing next steps and involving in decision-making. Patients who underwent emergency surgery, had no previous anesthetic exposure, had clinically significant level of preoperative anxiety, had no history of previous hospital admission, and had moderate-severe preoperative pain were found to have poor PPAC.

Keywords: Clinical communication; Communication; Perioperative anesthetist communication; Perioperative communication; Quality of communication.