Association of Alternative Anticoagulation Strategies and Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Stroke While Taking a Direct Oral Anticoagulant
- PMID: 37225430
- PMCID: PMC10435051
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207422
Association of Alternative Anticoagulation Strategies and Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Stroke While Taking a Direct Oral Anticoagulant
Abstract
Background and objectives: Ischemic stroke despite a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is increasingly common and portends a high risk of subsequent ischemic stroke. The efficacy and safety of antithrombotic regimens after the condition are unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke despite DOACs with and without an alternative antithrombotic regimen and determine the risk factors of recurrent ischemic stroke while on anticoagulation.
Methods: In a population-based, propensity score-weighted, retrospective cohort study, we compared the clinical outcomes of DOAC-to-warfarin switch, DOAC-to-DOAC switch (DOACswitch), or addition of antiplatelet agents, with those of unchanged DOAC regimen (DOACsame) among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who developed the first ischemic stroke despite a DOAC from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, in Hong Kong. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage, acute coronary syndrome, and death. We performed competing risk regression analyses to compare the clinical endpoints and determined the predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke in an unweighted multivariable logistic regression model.
Results: During the 6-year study period, among 45,946 patients with AF on a DOAC as stroke prophylaxis, 2,908 patients developed ischemic stroke despite a DOAC. A total of 2,337 patients with NVAF were included in the final analyses. Compared with DOACsame, warfarin (aHR 1.96, 95% CI 1.27-3.02, p = 0.002) and DOACswitch (aHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25-2.11, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. In the DOACsame group, adjunctive antiplatelet agent was not associated with a reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Diabetes mellitus, concurrent cytochrome P450/P-glycoprotein (CYP/P-gp) modulators, and large artery atherosclerotic disease (LAD) were predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke.
Discussion: In patients with NVAF with ischemic stroke despite a DOAC, the increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke with switching to warfarin called for caution against such practice, while the increased ischemic stroke with DOAC-to-DOAC switch demands further studies. Adjunctive antiplatelet agent did not seem to reduce ischemic stroke relapse. Because diabetes mellitus, the use of CYP/P-gp modulators, and LAD were predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke, further investigations should evaluate whether strict glycemic control, DOAC level monitoring, and routine screening for carotid and intracranial atherosclerosis may reduce ischemic stroke recurrence in these patients.
Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with NVAF experiencing an ischemic stroke while being treated with a DOAC, continuing treatment with that DOAC is more effective at preventing recurrent ischemic stroke than switching to a different DOAC or to warfarin.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
Conflict of interest statement
Y.M.B. Ip, H. Ko, L. Lau, A. Yao, G.L.H. Wong, T.C.F. Yip, X. Leng, H. Chan, H. Chan, V. Mok, Y. Soo, and T.W. Leung report no disclosures relevant to the article. G. Lau received grants from Croucher Foundation, Research Fund Secretariat of the Food and Health Bureau, Innovation and Technology Bureau, Research Grants Council, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai and Pfizer; and consultation fees from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. D. Seiffge received research funding from the Bangerter Rhyner Foundation and AstraZeneca. He served on advisory boards, consultancy, or speaker bureau for AsztaZeneca, Bioxodes, VarmX, Javeline, and Vifor. All fees were paid to his employer and used for research funding. All outside the submitted work. Go to
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of suboptimal anticoagulation treatment with antiplatelet therapy and warfarin on clinical outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A population-wide cohort study.Heart Rhythm. 2016 Aug;13(8):1581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.049. Epub 2016 Mar 28. Heart Rhythm. 2016. PMID: 27033342
-
Risk of both intracranial hemorrhage and ischemic stroke in elderly individuals with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: Analysis of the ANAFIE registry.Int J Stroke. 2023 Oct;18(8):986-995. doi: 10.1177/17474930231175807. Epub 2023 May 23. Int J Stroke. 2023. PMID: 37154598 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Efficacy and Safety Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Warfarin After Direct Oral Anticoagulant Failure.J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 5;12(23):e029979. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029979. Epub 2023 Dec 1. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023. PMID: 38038171 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Narrative Review of Current Literature and Guidelines.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 May;23(5):235-262. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01266-2. Epub 2023 Apr 11. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37037980 Review.
-
Timing of Anticoagulation after Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.Can J Neurol Sci. 2023 Jul;50(4):503-514. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2022.268. Epub 2022 Jun 28. Can J Neurol Sci. 2023. PMID: 35762354 Review.
Cited by
-
Challenging anticoagulation decisions in atrial fibrillation: a narrative review.Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17539447241290429. doi: 10.1177/17539447241290429. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2024. PMID: 39413210 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion vs Standard of Care After Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation.JAMA Neurol. 2024 Sep 23;81(11):1150-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2882. Online ahead of print. JAMA Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39374446
-
The Impact of Changing Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events Despite Anticoagulation.Neurohospitalist. 2024 Oct;14(4):379-388. doi: 10.1177/19418744241254897. Epub 2024 May 15. Neurohospitalist. 2024. PMID: 39308467
-
Lipid control and stroke risk in atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants and statins.Eur Stroke J. 2024 Aug 19:23969873241272530. doi: 10.1177/23969873241272530. Online ahead of print. Eur Stroke J. 2024. PMID: 39158514 Free PMC article.
-
Atrial fibrillation: stroke prevention.Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Feb 1;37:100797. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100797. eCollection 2024 Feb. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024. PMID: 38362551 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lee JJ, Ha ACT, Dorian P, Verma M, Goodman SG, Friedrich JO. Meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin according to time in therapeutic range in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2021;140:62-68. - PubMed
-
- Stretz C, Wu TY, Wilson D, et al. . Ischaemic stroke in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92(11):1164-1172. - PubMed
-
- Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. . Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883-891. - PubMed
-
- Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. . Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981-992. - PubMed
-
- Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. . Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139-1151. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials