Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features

Ambio. 2023 Nov;52(11):1793-1803. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01885-6. Epub 2023 Jun 2.

Abstract

Detailed spatial data are an essential part of land use planning and decision-making. Their spatial resolution sets limitations to their use, as coarse datasets are not suitable for detecting small-scale phenomena. In this study, we explored the effects of spatial resolution on the ecological outcome of a conservation prioritization process in Zonation software. Our study area was in Evo, southern Finland, covering a mosaic of managed and conserved forests. We produced the feature layers describing the forest characteristics using high-resolution remote sensing datasets, object-based mapping methods, and forest site type data. We found that increasing the resolution above the 16 m baseline resolution resulted in substantial errors. The conservation errors were the highest for rare features related to European Aspen, whereas the common features related to dominant tree species could benefit from the growth of cell size. We conclude that adequate spatial resolution is a prerequisite for efficient conservation prioritization, and that the size and spatial distribution of the features affect the resolution requirements.

Keywords: Conservation prioritization; Forests; Remote sensing; Scale; Spatial resolution; Zonation.

MeSH terms

  • Biodiversity*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / methods
  • Finland
  • Forests*
  • Trees