International Perspectives on Modifications to the Surgical Safety Checklist

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17183.

Abstract

Importance: Modification of the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a critical component of its implementation. To facilitate the SSC's use, it is important to know how surgical teams modify their SSCs, their reasons for making modifications, and the opportunities and challenges teams face in SSC tailoring.

Objective: To study SSC modifications in high-income hospital settings in 5 countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews based on the survey used in the quantitative study. Each interviewee was asked a core set of questions and various follow-up questions based on their survey responses. Interviews were conducted from July 2019 to February 2020 in person and online using teleconferencing software. Surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and hospital administrators from the 5 countries were recruited through a survey and snowball sampling.

Main outcomes and measures: Interviewees' attitudes and perceptions on SSC modifications and their perceived impact on operating rooms.

Results: A total of 51 surgical team members and hospital administrators from the 5 countries were interviewed (37 [75%] with >10 years of service; 28 [55%] women). There were 15 (29%) surgeons, 13 (26%) nurses, 15 (29%) anesthesiologists, and 8 (16%) health administrators. Five themes emerged concerning the awareness and involvement in SSC modifications; reasons for modifications; types of modifications; the outcomes of modifications; and perceived barriers to SSC modifications. Based on the interviews, some SSCs may go many years without being revisited or modified. SSCs are modified to ensure they address local issues and standards of practice and that they are fit for purpose. Modifications are also made following adverse events to reduce the risk of reoccurrence. Interviewees described adding, moving, and removing elements from their SSCs, which increased their sense of ownership in their SSC and participation in its performance. Some barriers to modification included leadership and the SSC's inclusion in hospitals' electronic medical record.

Conclusions and relevance: In this qualitative study of surgical team members and administrators, interviewees described addressing contemporary surgical issues through various SSC modifications. The process of SSC modification may improve team cohesion and buy-in in addition to providing opportunities for teams to improve patient safety.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Checklist*
  • Female
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Internationality
  • Male
  • Operating Rooms
  • Surgeons*
  • United States

Grants and funding