A crosswalk of commonly used frailty scales
- PMID: 37289180
- PMCID: PMC10592534
- DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18453
A crosswalk of commonly used frailty scales
Abstract
Background: Several validated scales have been developed to measure frailty, yet the direct relationship between these measures and their scores remains unknown. To bridge this gap, we created a crosswalk of the most commonly used frailty scales.
Methods: We used data from 7070 community-dwelling older adults who participated in National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Round 5 to construct a crosswalk among frailty scales. We operationalized the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture Index (SOF), FRAIL Scale, Frailty Phenotype, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Vulnerable Elder Survey-13 (VES-13), Tilburg Frailty Indictor (TFI), Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS), and 40-item Frailty Index (FI). A crosswalk between FI and the frailty scales was created using the equipercentile linking method, a statistical procedure that produces equivalent scoring between scales according to percentile distributions. To demonstrate its validity, we determined the 4-year mortality risk across all scales for low-risk (equivalent to FI <0.20), moderate-risk (FI 0.20 to <0.40), and high-risk (FI ≥0.40) categories.
Results: Using NHATS, the feasibility of calculating frailty scores was at least 90% for all nine scales, with the FI having the highest number of calculable scores. Participants considered frail on FI (cutpoint of 0.25) corresponded to the following scores on each frailty measure: SOF 1.3, FRAIL 1.7, Phenotype 1.7, CFS 5.3, VES-13 5.5, TFI 4.4, GFI 4.8, and EFS 5.8. Conversely, individuals considered frail according to the cutpoint of each frailty measure corresponded to the following FI scores: 0.37 for SOF, 0.40 for FRAIL, 0.42 for Phenotype, 0.21 for CFS, 0.16 for VES-13, 0.28 for TFI, 0.21 for GFI, and 0.37 for EFS. Across frailty scales, the 4-year mortality risks between the same categories were similar in magnitude.
Conclusion: Our results provide clinicians and researchers with a useful tool to directly compare and interpret frailty scores across scales.
Keywords: equipercentile; frailty; linking; relationship.
© 2023 The American Geriatrics Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Kim has been supported by the grants from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health for unrelated work. He received personal fee from Alosa Health and VillageMD for unrelated work. The rest of the authors have no conflicts.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Claims-Based Frailty Index and Its Relationship With Commonly Used Clinical Frailty Measures.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Jul 1;79(7):glae094. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae094. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38557604
-
Operationalization of frailty using eight commonly used scales and comparison of their ability to predict all-cause mortality.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Sep;61(9):1537-51. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12420. Epub 2013 Aug 26. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013. PMID: 24028357
-
Frailty and risk of adverse outcomes among community-dwelling older adults in China: a comparison of four different frailty scales.Front Public Health. 2023 May 10;11:1154809. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1154809. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37234757 Free PMC article.
-
Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review.Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Eur J Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27039014 Review.
-
Assessing Frailty with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): A Review of Reliability and Validity.Clin Interv Aging. 2021 May 18;16:863-875. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S298191. eCollection 2021. Clin Interv Aging. 2021. PMID: 34040363 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and future estimates of frailty and pre-frailty in a population-based sample of people 70 years and older in Norway: the HUNT study.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Sep 10;36(1):188. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02839-y. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024. PMID: 39254900 Free PMC article.
-
Frailty in Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2431067. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31067. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39212986 Free PMC article.
-
Unleashing frailty from laboratory into real world: A critical step toward frailty-guided clinical care of older adults.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3299-3314. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19151. Epub 2024 Aug 21. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024. PMID: 39166879
-
Prevalence of Independence at Home-Qualifying Beneficiaries in Traditional Medicare, 2014-2021.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421102. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21102. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38990572 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Benefits and Harms of Pharmacotherapy in Older Adults with Frailty: Insights from Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies of Routine Health Care Data.Drugs Aging. 2024 Jul;41(7):583-600. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01121-0. Epub 2024 Jul 2. Drugs Aging. 2024. PMID: 38954400 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
