Purpose: Ventricular septal perforation (VSP) is a critical complication of acute myocardial infarction. Various surgical procedures for it have been developed; however, surgical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. In 2010, we introduced geometrical infarct exclusion (GIE) as a modification of the Komeda-David technique. This retrospective study compared the surgical outcomes of our geometric infarct exclusion technique to those of other surgical procedures.
Methods: This study included 38 patients who underwent surgery for VSP. They were divided into patients who underwent GIE (GIE group; n = 17) and those who underwent other procedures (non-GIE group; n = 21). The clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared.
Results: Operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cardiac arrest times in the GIE group were significantly longer than those in the non-GIE group (p <0.001). A residual shunt was observed in one patient (5.8%) in the GIE group and eight (38.0%) in the non-GIE group (p = 0.026). No patients in the GIE group required a reoperation for the residual shut, while two patients required it in the non-GIE group (p = 0.492). Operative mortality was insignificantly different between the two groups.
Conclusion: Geometric infarct exclusion has a longer procedural time than does other surgical procedures but can reduce the rates of residual shunts and reoperations.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; infarct exclusion; ventricular septal perforation.