Management of giant cell tumors of the distal radius

Mikaela H Sullivan; Sarah H Townsley; Marco Rizzo; Steven L Moran; Matthew T Houdek

doi:10.1016/j.jor.2023.06.001

Management of giant cell tumors of the distal radius

J Orthop. 2023 Jun 2:41:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Authors

Mikaela H Sullivan¹, Sarah H Townsley¹, Marco Rizzo¹, Steven L Moran², Matthew T Houdek¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
² Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

PMID: 37324809
PMCID: PMC10267431 (available on 2024-07-01)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.06.001

Abstract

Background: The distal radius is the most common location for giant cell tumors (GCT) in the upper extremity. Treatment should balance the goals of maximizing function and minimizing recurrence and other complications. Given the complexity in surgical treatment, various techniques have been described without clear standards of treatment.

Objectives: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of evaluation of patients presenting with GCT of the distal radius, discuss management, and provide an updated summary on outcomes of treatment options.

Conclusion: Surgical treatment should consider tumor Grade, involvement of the articular surface, and patient-specific factors. Options include intralesional curettage and en bloc resection with reconstruction. Within reconstruction techniques, radiocarpal joint preserving and sparing procedures can be considered. Campanacci Grade 1 tumors can be successfully treated with joint preserving procedures, whereas for Campanacci Grade 3 tumors consideration should be given to joint resection to prevent recurrence. Treatment of Campanacci Grade 2 tumors is debated in the literature. Intralesional curettage and adjuvants can successfully treat cases where the articular surface can be preserved, while en-bloc resection should be used in cases where the articular surface cannot undergo aggressive curettage. A variety of reconstructive techniques are used for cases needing resection, with no clear gold standard. Joint sparing procedures preserve motion at the wrist joint, whereas joint sacrificing procedures preserve grip strength. Choice of reconstructive procedure should be made based on patient-specific factors, considering relative functional outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates.