Perceptions of forensic scientists on statistical models, sequence data, and ethical implications for DNA evidence evaluations: A qualitative assessment

Sanne E Aalbers; Alyna T Khan; Bruce S Weir

doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100335

Perceptions of forensic scientists on statistical models, sequence data, and ethical implications for DNA evidence evaluations: A qualitative assessment

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jun 3:6:100335. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100335. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Sanne E Aalbers^{1

2}, Alyna T Khan^{1

2}, Bruce S Weir^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
² Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Abstract

With the introduction of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology in the forensic field, it will be of interest to assess if forensic scientists feel equipped to interpret and present DNA evidence for sequence data. Here, we describe perceptions of sixteen U.S.-based forensic scientists on statistical models, sequence data, and ethical implications for DNA evidence evaluations. To get an in-depth understanding of the current situation, we used a qualitative research approach with a cross-sectional study design. Semi-structured interviews (N = 16) were conducted with U.S. forensic scientists working with DNA evidence. Open-ended interview questions were used to explore participants' views and needs surrounding the use of statistical models and sequence data for forensic purposes. We conducted a conventional content analysis using ATLAS. ti software and employed a second coder to ensure reliability of our results. Eleven themes emerged: 1) a statistical model that maximizes the value of the evidence is preferred; 2) a high-level understanding of the statistical model used is generally sufficient; 3) transparency is key in minimizing the risk of creating black boxes; 4) training and education should be an ongoing effort; 5) the effectiveness of presenting results in court can be improved; 6) NGS has the potential to become revolutionary; 7) some hesitations surrounding the use of sequence data remain; 8) there is a need for a concrete plan to alleviate barriers to the implementation of sequencing techniques; 9) ethics plays a major part in the role of a forensic scientist; 10) ethical barriers for sequence data depend on the application; 11) DNA evidence has its limitations. The results of this study give insight into the perceptions of forensic scientists regarding the use of statistical models and sequence data, providing valuable information in the move towards implementing sequencing methods for DNA evidence evaluations.

Keywords: DNA evidence Evaluations; Forensic statistics; Next generation sequencing; Qualitative research.