Purpose: We aimed to perform serial quality-of-life (QoL) evaluations and comparisons in patients after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (IA) or cervical anastomosis (CA).
Methods: Between November 2012 and March 2015, patients who underwent esophagectomy with IA or CA for mid-esophageal to distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were followed up. QoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and esophagus-specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-OES18) before surgery, at discharge, and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge. Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess the mean score differences (MDs) of each QoL scale between the two techniques, and changes in QoL over time. Potential confounders were adjusted.
Results: In total, 219 patients were analyzed (IA, n = 127; CA, n = 92). All patients' QoL decreased immediately after esophagectomy. Global QoL and most functioning and symptom scales exhibited a return to baseline levels within 2 years of discharge, except for physical functioning and several symptoms (dyspnea, diarrhea, dysphagia, and reflux). There was no difference in overall health score between the two groups (MD 2, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1 to 6). Compared with IA, patients with CA reported more trouble with taste (MD - 12, 95% CI - 19 to - 4) and talking (MD - 11, 95% CI - 19 to 2) at discharge. No differences in long-term QoL were found between groups.
Conclusions: CA was associated with more trouble with taste and talking in the short term than IA. The long-term QoL did not differ between the two approaches.
© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.