Knowing Is Not Doing: A Qualitative Study of Parental Views on Family Beverage Choice

Nutrients. 2023 Jun 8;15(12):2665. doi: 10.3390/nu15122665.

Abstract

Objective: Sugary drink consumption is associated with adverse health outcomes in children, highlighting the need for scalable family interventions that address barriers to water consumption. To inform development of a scalable, health-care-system-based intervention targeting family beverage choice, a formative qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with parents whose children were identified as over-consuming sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and/or fruit juice (FJ). The first goal of these interviews was to understand, in a diverse real-world patient population, what parents viewed as the primary drivers of their family's beverage choices, and explore how these drivers might need to be addressed in order to make changes to beverage consumption. A second goal was to explore parental preferences for planned intervention components. An exploratory goal of the interviews was to examine whether knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs around family beverage choice differed across racial and ethnic groups in this sample.

Design: Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted and interviews audio-recorded and transcribed.

Participants: 39 parents/caregivers of children ages 1-8 who over-consumed sugary drinks as determined by screenings at pediatric visits.

Phenomenon of interest: Parents were interviewed about family beverage choices and preferences to inform development of a multi-component intervention.

Analysis: Thematic analysis was performed, including comparison of themes across racial/ethnic groups.

Results: Parents expressed that sugary drinks were unhealthy and water was a better alternative. Most were familiar with the health consequences of excess sugar consumption. They identified many reasons why sugary drinks are chosen over water despite this knowledge. One common reason was concern about tap water safety. Few differences were noted across racial and ethnic groups in our sample. Parents were enthusiastic about a technology-based intervention to be delivered through their child's doctor's office.

Conclusions and implications: Knowledge is not enough to change behavior. Beverage interventions need to be easy to access, make water more appealing, and elevate beverage choice above the "white noise" of everyday life. Delivering an intervention in a clinical setting could provide an extra level of care, while technology would reduce the amount of live contact and decrease the burden for clinicians and parents.

Keywords: beverage; child; drinking water; health care; parent; pediatrics; sugar-sweetened beverages; tap water.

MeSH terms

  • Beverages*
  • Child
  • Fruit and Vegetable Juices
  • Humans
  • Parents
  • Sugar-Sweetened Beverages* / adverse effects
  • Water

Substances

  • Water