Physicians' Clinical Behavior During Fluid Evaluation Encounters

Muhammad K Hayat Syed; Kathryn Pendleton; John Park; Craig Weinert

doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000933

Physicians' Clinical Behavior During Fluid Evaluation Encounters

Crit Care Explor. 2023 Jun 27;5(7):e0933. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000933. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Authors

Muhammad K Hayat Syed¹, Kathryn Pendleton², John Park³, Craig Weinert²

Affiliations

¹ Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
² Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School. Minneapolis, MN.
³ Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Abstract

We sought to identify factors affecting physicians' cognition and clinical behavior when evaluating patients that may need fluid therapy.

Background: Proponents of dynamic fluid responsiveness testing advocate measuring cardiac output or stroke volume after a maneuver to prove that further fluids will increase cardiac output. However, surveys suggest that fluid therapy in clinical practice is often given without prior responsiveness testing.

Design: Thematic analysis of face-to-face structured interviews.

Setting: ICUs and medical-surgical wards in acute care hospitals.

Subjects: Intensivists and hospitalist physicians.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We conducted 43 interviews with experienced physicians in 19 hospitals. Hospitalized patients with hypotension, tachycardia, oliguria, or elevated serum lactate are commonly seen by physicians who weigh the risks and benefits of more fluid therapy. Encounters are often with unfamiliar patients and evaluation and decisions are completed quickly without involving other physicians. Dynamic testing for fluid responsiveness is used much less often than static methods and fluid boluses are often ordered with no testing at all. This approach is rationalized by factors that discourage dynamic testing: unavailability of equipment, time to obtain test results, or lack of expertise in obtaining valid data. Two mental calculations are particularly influential: physicians' estimate of the base rate of fluid responsiveness (determined by physical examination, chart review, and previous responses to fluid boluses) and physicians' perception of patient harm if 500 or 1,000 mL fluid boluses are ordered. When the perception of harm is low, physicians use heuristics that rationalize skipping dynamic testing.

Limitations: Geographic limitation to hospitals in Minnesota, United States.

Conclusions: If dynamic responsiveness testing is to be used more often in routine clinical practice, physicians must be more convinced of the benefits of dynamic testing, that they can obtain valid results quickly and believe that even small fluid boluses harm their patients.

Keywords: fluid therapy; resuscitation; sepsis; shock; ultrasound.