Cost minimization analysis of short-duration antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis C positive donor kidney transplants

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Nov-Dec;63(6):1700-1705.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.06.027. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

Abstract

Background: Trials describing 4-12 week courses of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission from infected donors to uninfected kidney transplant recipients (D+/R-transplants), may be limited in application by costs and delayed access to expensive DAAs. A short prophylactic strategy may be safer and cost-effective. Here, we report a cost minimization analysis using the health system perspective to determine the least expensive DAA regimen, using available published strategies.

Objectives: To conduct cost-minimization analyses (CMAs) from the health system perspective of four DAA regimens to prevent and/or treat HCV transmission from D+/R-kidney transplants.

Methods: CMAs comparing 4 strategies: 1) 7-day prophylaxis with generic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), with 12-week branded glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for those with transmission; 2) 8-day branded G/P prophylaxis, with 12-week branded SOF/VEL/voxilaprevir for those with transmission; 3) 4-week perioperative generic SOF/VEL prophylaxis, with 12-week branded G/P for those with transmission; and 4) 8-week branded G/P "transmit-and-treat." We included data from published literature to estimate the probability of viral transmission in patients who received DAA prophylaxis, and assumed a 100% transmission rate for those who received the "transmit-and-treat" approach.

Results: In base-case analyses, strategies 1 (expected cost [EC]: $2326) and 2 (expected cost: $2646) were less expensive than strategies 3 (EC: $4859) and 4 (EC: $18,525). Threshold analyses for 7-day SOF/VEL versus 8-day G/P suggested that there were reasonable input levels at which the 8-day strategy may be least costly. The threshold values for the SOF/VEL prophylaxis strategies (7-day vs. 4- week) indicated that the 4-week strategy is unlikely to be less costly under any reasonable value of the input variables.

Conclusions: Short duration DAA prophylaxis using 7 days of SOF/VEL or 8 days of G/P has the potential to yield significant cost savings for D+/R- kidney transplants.

MeSH terms

  • Antiviral Agents / therapeutic use
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Genotype
  • Hepacivirus
  • Hepatitis C* / drug therapy
  • Hepatitis C* / prevention & control
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic*
  • Humans
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Sofosbuvir / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Sofosbuvir