Temporal Clustering of Critical Illness Events on Medical Wards

JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Sep 1;183(9):924-932. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2629.

Abstract

Importance: Recognizing and preventing patient deterioration is important for hospital safety.

Objective: To investigate whether critical illness events (in-hospital death or intensive care unit [ICU] transfer) are associated with greater risk of subsequent critical illness events for other patients on the same medical ward.

Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective cohort study in 5 hospitals in Toronto, Canada, including 118 529 hospitalizations. Patients were admitted to general internal medicine wards between April 1, 2010, and October 31, 2017. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2020, and April 10, 2023.

Exposures: Critical illness events (in-hospital death or ICU transfer).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death or ICU transfer. The association between critical illness events on the same ward across 6-hour intervals was studied using discrete-time survival analysis, adjusting for patient and situational factors. The association between critical illness events on different comparable wards in the same hospital was measured as a negative control.

Results: The cohort included 118 529 hospitalizations (median age, 72 years [IQR, 56-83 years]; 50.7% male). Death or ICU transfer occurred in 8785 hospitalizations (7.4%). Patients were more likely to experience the primary outcome after exposure to 1 prior event (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.30-1.48) and more than 1 prior event (AOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.33-1.68) in the prior 6-hour interval compared with no exposure. The exposure was associated with increased odds of subsequent ICU transfer (1 event: AOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.54-1.81; >1 event: AOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.79-2.36) but not death alone (1 event: AOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.97-1.19; >1 event: AOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.09). There was no significant association between critical illness events on different wards within the same hospital.

Conclusions and relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that patients are more likely to be transferred to the ICU in the hours after another patient's critical illness event on the same ward. This phenomenon could have several explanations, including increased recognition of critical illness and preemptive ICU transfers, resource diversion to the first event, or fluctuations in ward or ICU capacity. Patient safety may be improved by better understanding the clustering of ICU transfers on medical wards.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Cohort Studies
  • Critical Illness* / mortality
  • Critical Illness* / therapy
  • Female
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units*
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies

Grants and funding