Background: Pivotal trials in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) demonstrate that earlier use of biologics is associated with greater likelihood of response/remission, but multiple studies have identified that in the real world, biologic treatment is often delayed, thereby limiting optimal effectiveness and increasing likelihood of adverse outcomes. Further assessment of patient, provider, and payor factors that contribute to therapy choice is needed. We assessed utilization of vedolizumab (VDZ) and performed a real-world assessment using administrative datasets. Here, we describe the different treatment patterns and demographics of patients who received VDZ.
Methods: We identified VDZ-treated patients (aged ≥18 years) with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the MarketScan commercial and Medicare claims databases from 2017 to 2019 and included those who had continuous enrollment in the same health plan for ≥12 months prior to their initial IBD diagnostic claim, ≥1 VDZ claim after the initial IBD diagnosis, and continuous enrollment for ≥12 months prior to and after their initial UC or CD diagnosis. Patients exposed to VDZ, anti-TNF, or other biologic therapy in the 12-month pre-index period were excluded. We pre-defined 5 treatment pathways: (1) EARLY VDZ - VDZ within 30 days of first IBD diagnostic claim; (2) DELAYED VDZ 1 - immunomodulators and then switch to VDZ; (3) DELAYED VDZ 2 - corticosteroids with immunomodulators prior to VDZ; (4) DELAYED VDZ 3 - 5-ASA with corticosteroids prior to VDZ; or (5) DELAYED VDZ 4 - 5-ASA with corticosteroids and immunomodulators prior to VDZ. Differences in patient baseline characteristics among these treatment pathways were analyzed descriptively.
Results: We identified 136,315 patients with UC and 103,591 with CD, from which 1,342 patients with UC (median age 43 years; 51.0% male; 96.4% commercially insured; 86.4% diagnosed in 2017) and 964 with CD (median age 45 years; 43.6% male; 94.6% commercially insured; 88.6% diagnosed in 2017) received VDZ and met criteria. The proportions of patients by treatment pathway were (UC|CD): EARLY VDZ (6.6%|9.6%); DELAYED VDZ 1 (7.5%|19.0%); DELAYED VDZ 2 (14.8%|36.8%); DELAYED VDZ 3 (37.6%|19.0%); DELAYED VDZ 4 (33.4%|15.6%). Among patients with UC, EARLY VDZ vs DELAYED VDZ cohorts had median age of 40 vs 44 years and proportion of men of 46.1% vs 51.4%. Among patients with CD, EARLY VDZ vs DELAYED VDZ had median age of 43 vs 45 years and proportion of men of 39.8%% vs 43.9%. For both indications, no meaningful differences among treatment groups by geographic region, payor type (i.e., commercial vs Medicare), and year of diagnosis were observed.
Conclusion: In this administrative real-world dataset, fewer than 10% of patients with IBD were treated with VDZ within 30 days of diagnosis, and these patients were more likely to be younger and women. These findings are distinct from guidelines suggesting VDZ may be used earlier, or due to its safety profile, preferentially in older patients at higher risk for infection. Further analyses of safety and effectiveness outcomes are underway.
Copyright © 2021 by The American College of Gastroenterology.