Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2325658.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25658.

Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Cardiometabolic Risk in People With or at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Cardiometabolic Risk in People With or at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Tian Wang et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Plant-based diets are known to improve cardiometabolic risk in the general population, but their effects on people at high risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain inconclusive.

Objective: To assess the association of vegetarian diets with major cardiometabolic risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and body weight in people with or at high risk of CVDs.

Data sources: This meta-analysis was registered before the study was conducted. Systematic searches performed included Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL from inception until July 31, 2021.

Study selection: Eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that delivered vegetarian diets in adults with or at high risk of CVDs and measured LDL-C, HbA1c or SBP were included. Of the 7871 records screened, 29 (0.4%; 20 studies) met inclusion criteria.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data including demographics, study design, sample size, and diet description, and performed risk of bias assessment. A random-effects model was used to assess mean changes in LDL-C, HbA1c, SBP, and body weight. The overall certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.

Main outcomes and measures: Mean differences between groups in changes (preintervention vs postintervention) of LDL-C, HbA1c, and SBP; secondary outcomes were changes in body weight and energy intake.

Results: Twenty RCTs involving 1878 participants (range of mean age, 28-64 years) were included, and mean duration of intervention was 25.4 weeks (range, 2 to 24 months). Four studies targeted people with CVDs, 7 focused on diabetes, and 9 included people with at least 2 CVD risk factors. Overall, relative to all comparison diets, meta-analyses showed that consuming vegetarian diets for an average of 6 months was associated with decreased LDL-C, HbA1c, and body weight by 6.6 mg/dL (95% CI, -10.1 to -3.1), 0.24% (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.07), and 3.4 kg (95% CI, -4.9 to -2.0), respectively, but the association with SBP was not significant (-0.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, -2.8 to 2.6). The GRADE assessment showed a moderate level of evidence for LDL-C and HbA1c reduction.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, consuming a vegetarian diet was associated with significant improvements in LDL-C, HbA1c and body weight beyond standard therapy in individuals at high risk of CVDs. Additional high-quality trials are warranted to further elucidate the effects of healthy plant-based diets in people with CVDs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram of Study Selection
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Random Effects Model Meta-Analysis for Changes in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Concentrations Comparing Vegetarian Diets Intervention and All Comparison Diets, Grouped by Disease Status of Participants
CVD indicates cardiovascular disease.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Random Effects Model Meta-Analysis for Changes in Hemoglobin A1c Comparing Vegetarian Diets Intervention and All Comparison Diets, Grouped by Disease Status of Participants
CVD indicates cardiovascular disease; NA, not applicable.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Random Effects Model Meta-Analysis for Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Comparing Vegetarian Diets Intervention and All Comparison Diets, Grouped by Disease Status of Participants
CVD indicates cardiovascular disease.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Timmis A, Vardas P, Townsend N, et al. ; Atlas Writing Group, European Society of Cardiology . European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(8):716-799. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab892 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenland P, Knoll MD, Stamler J, et al. . Major risk factors as antecedents of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease events. JAMA. 2003;290(7):891-897. doi:10.1001/jama.290.7.891 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lloyd-Jones DM, Leip EP, Larson MG, et al. . Prediction of lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease by risk factor burden at 50 years of age. Circulation. 2006;113(6):791-798. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.548206 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. ; ESC National Cardiac Societies; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Vadiveloo M, et al. . 2021 dietary guidance to improve cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144(23):e472-e487. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001031 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types