To compare the effectiveness and safety of spironolactone versus lecithin-bound iodine in patients with central serous retinopathy (CSR). Chinese diabetes patients aged>18 years with CSR with persistent increased level of subretinal fluid (SRF) were enrolled. Subjects were randomized to receive either oral lecithin-bound iodine (390µg/kg/day) or oral spironolactone (50mg/day) for 6 months. A total of 200 patients were randomized and completed the study. Compared to spironolactone group, patients treated with lecithin-bound iodine had greater proportion of eye with complete resolution (87% vs 81%, p>0.005). Higher improvement in height of SRF was observed in lecithin-bound iodine-treated patients as compared with Spironolactone-treated patients (91.2[87.5] vs 142.5 [121.1]; p>0.005). However, no statistically significant difference was observed on none of comparisons. Compared to Spironolactone, the patients treated with lecithin-bound iodine had greater improvement in lesion size, central macular thickness and best-corrected visual acuity. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in any of parameter assessed. (p>0.005). The results of the present study suggested that the lecithin-bound iodine was found more effective (nnumerically) than spironolactone in Chinese diabetes patients with CSR.