Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar:17:109069.
doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109069. Epub 2023 Feb 18.

A Predictive Decision Analytics Approach for Primary Care Operations Management: A Case Study of Double-Booking Strategy Design and Evaluation

Affiliations

A Predictive Decision Analytics Approach for Primary Care Operations Management: A Case Study of Double-Booking Strategy Design and Evaluation

Yuan Zhou et al. Comput Ind Eng. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Primary care plays a vital role for individuals and families in accessing care, keeping well, and improving quality of life. However, the complexities and uncertainties in the primary care delivery system (e.g., patient no-shows/walk-ins, staffing shortage, COVID-19 pandemic) have brought significant challenges in its operations management, which can potentially lead to poor patient outcomes and negative primary care operations (e.g., loss of productivity, inefficiency). This paper presents a decision analytics approach developed based on predictive analytics and hybrid simulation to better facilitate management of the underlying complexities and uncertainties in primary care operations. A case study was conducted in a local family medicine clinic to demonstrate the use of this approach for patient no-show management. In this case study, a patient no-show prediction model was used in conjunction with an integrated agent-based and discrete-event simulation model to design and evaluate double-booking strategies. Using the predicted patient no-show information, a prediction-based double-booking strategy was created and compared against two other strategies, namely random and designated time. Scenario-based experiments were then conducted to examine the impacts of different double-booking strategies on clinic's operational outcomes, focusing on the trade-offs between the clinic productivity (measured by daily patient throughput) and efficiency (measured by visit cycle and patient wait time for doctor). The results showed that the best productivity-efficiency balance was derived under the prediction-based double-booking strategy. The proposed hybrid decision analytics approach has the potential to better support decision-making in primary care operations management and improve the system's performance. Further, it can be generalized in the context of various healthcare settings for broader applications.

Keywords: decision-making; double-booking; patient no-show; prediction; primary care; simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Per UTA policy, the following statement is included: Dr. Kay-Yut Chen, has a potential research conflict of interest due to a financial interest with companies Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Boostr and DecisionNext. A management plan has been created to preserve objectivity in research in accordance with UTA policy.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A conceptual framework of the hybrid decision analytics approach
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A high-level DES-ABS simulation design
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A general flow chart of clinic personnel working behavior logic
Figure 4(a)
Figure 4(a)
Patient wait time for doctor of selected experimental scenarios under different double-booking strategies (prediction-based vs. random/designated time)
Figure 4(b)
Figure 4(b)
Visit cycle time of selected experimental scenarios under different double-booking strategies (prediction-based vs. random/designated time)
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Trade-offs between visit cycle time and clinic throughput under different double-booking strategies

Similar articles

References

    1. Starfield B (1992) Primary care: concept, evaluation, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Jimenez G, Matchar D, Koh G, Tyagi S, Van der Kleij R, Chavannes N, & Car J (2021). Revisiting the four core functions (4Cs) of primary care: Operational definitions and complexities. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 22, E68. 10.1017/S1463423621000669 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang CH, Stukel TA, Flood AB, & Goodman DC (2011). Primary care physician workforce and Medicare beneficiaries’ health outcomes. Jama, 305(20), 2096–2104. 10.1001/jama.2011.665 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shi L (2012). The impact of primary care: a focused review. Scientifica, 2012. 10.6064/2012/432892 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Starfield B, Shi L, & Macinko J (2005). Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. The milbank quarterly, 83(3), 457–502. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources