Characterizing infection prevention programs and urinary tract infection prevention practices in nursing homes: A mixed-methods study
- PMID: 37589094
- PMCID: PMC10782201
- DOI: 10.1017/ice.2023.127
Characterizing infection prevention programs and urinary tract infection prevention practices in nursing homes: A mixed-methods study
Abstract
Objective: US policies require robust nursing home (NH) infection prevention and control (IPC) programs to ensure safe care. We assessed IPC resources and practices related to catheter and non-catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI and UTI) prevention among NHs.
Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study from April 2018 through November 2019. Quantitative surveys assessed NH IPC program resources, practices, and communication during resident transfer. Semistructured qualitative interviews focused on IPC programs, CAUTI and UTI prevention practices, and resident transfer processes. Using a matrix as an analytic tool, findings from the quantitative survey data were combined with the qualitative data in the form of a joint display.
Results: Representatives from 51 NHs completed surveys; interviews were conducted with 13 participants from 7 NHs. Infection preventionists (IPs) had limited experience and/or additional roles, and in 36.7% of NHs, IPs had no specific IPC training. IP turnover was often mentioned during interviews. Most facilities were aware of their CAUTI and UTI rates and reported using prevention practices, such as hydration (85.7%) or nurse-initiated catheter discontinuation (65.3%). Qualitative interviewees confirmed use of these practices and expressed additional concerns about overuse of urine testing and antibiotics. Although transfer sheets were used by 84% to communicate about infections, the information received was described as suboptimal.
Conclusions: NHs identified IP challenges related to turnover, limited education, and serving multiple roles. However, most NHs reported awareness of their CAUTI and UTI rates as well as their use of prevention practices. Importantly, we identified opportunities to enhance communication between NHs and hospitals to improve resident care and safety.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Programs Between Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes and Non-Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;38(3):287-293. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.279. Epub 2016 Dec 5. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 27917728 Free PMC article.
-
Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the United States: a national comparative study.JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 27;173(10):874-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.101. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23529579 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative Results of a National Intervention to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection: A Pre-Post Observational Study.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;171(7_Suppl):S38-S44. doi: 10.7326/M18-3534. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31569231
-
Nursing interventions to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: part 2: staff education, monitoring, and care techniques.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;36(2):137-54. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000347655.56851.04. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19287262 Review.
-
Enhancing Resident Safety by Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infection: A National Initiative to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 1;61(1):86-94. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ236. Epub 2015 Mar 26. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25814630 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Reform of requirements for long-term care facilities, 42 CFR, 483.80. US Code of Federal Regulations website. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/chapter-IV/subchapter-G/part-483. Published 2016. Accessed July 27, 2022.
-
- Averill, J. B. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res 2002;12:855–866. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
