[Cervical sample-taking in the primary health service]

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2023 Jul 25;143(11). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0066. Print 2023 Aug 15.
[Article in Norwegian]

Abstract

Background: In Norway, approximately 360 000 cervical screening samples were taken in 2020, of which 11 000 were registered as inadequate. We therefore wished to investigate doctors' knowledge of cervical sample-taking in the primary health service.

Material and method: An anonymous survey on cervical sample-taking was sent by email to around 4 700 members of the Norwegian College of General Practice in September 2021.

Results: Of the 1 039 doctors who responded to the survey, 820 (79 %) reported that they always indicate the reason for taking the sample in the requisition form, and 898 (86 %) reported that they avoid taking a sample during menstruation. Only one in three doctors (343) correctly indicated the location of the squamocolumnar junction in postmenopausal women. In response to a question aimed at users of the ThinPrep method, which is particularly sensitive to sampling errors, 426 out of 697 (61 %) answered that they either avoid using a lubricant or use a water-based lubricant, while only 35 % of the doctors responded that they stop taking the sample if bleeding occurs.

Interpretation: The results show that although many doctors have satisfactory knowledge, a continuous focus on cervical sample-taking is essential. Correct sampling and knowledge of anatomical factors in postmenopausal women may be significant for reducing the number of inadequate samples.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Female
  • General Practice*
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Lubricants
  • Norway
  • Physicians, Primary Care*
  • Primary Health Care
  • Specimen Handling* / methods
  • Specimen Handling* / standards
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*

Substances

  • Lubricants