Crowdsourcing Medical Costs in Dermatology: Cross-sectional Study Analyzing Dermatologic GoFundMe Campaigns

Erica Mark; Mira Sridharan; Brian Florenzo; Olivia L Schenck; Mary-Margaret B Noland; John S Barbieri; Jules B Lipoff

doi:10.2196/34111

Crowdsourcing Medical Costs in Dermatology: Cross-sectional Study Analyzing Dermatologic GoFundMe Campaigns

JMIR Dermatol. 2022 Apr 22;5(2):e34111. doi: 10.2196/34111.

Authors

Erica Mark¹, Mira Sridharan¹, Brian Florenzo¹, Olivia L Schenck¹, Mary-Margaret B Noland¹, John S Barbieri², Jules B Lipoff^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
² Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
³ Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

PMID: 37632862
PMCID: PMC10334893
DOI: 10.2196/34111

Abstract

Background: Crowdfunding for medical costs is becoming increasingly popular. Few previous studies have described the fundraising characteristics and qualities associated with success.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize and investigate the qualities associated with successful dermatological fundraisers.

Methods: This cross-sectional study of dermatological GoFundMe campaigns collected data, including demographic variables, thematic variables using an inductive qualitative method, and quantitative information. Linear regression examined the qualities associated with success, which are defined based on funds raised when controlling for campaign goals. Logistic regression was used to examine qualities associated with extremely successful campaigns, defined as those raising >1.5 times the IQR. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.

Results: A total of 2008 publicly available campaigns at the time of data collection were evaluated. Nonmodifiable factors associated with greater success included male gender, age 20-40 years, and White race. Modifiable factors associated with success included more updates posted to the campaign page, non-self-identity of the campaign creator, mention of a chronic condition, and smiling in campaign profile photographs.

Conclusions: Understanding the modifiable factors of medical crowdfunding may inform future campaigns, and nonmodifiable factors may have policy implications for improving health care equity and financing. Crowdfunding for medical disease treatment may have potential implications for medical privacy and exacerbation of existing health care disparities. This study was limited to publicly available GoFundMe campaigns. Potential limitations for this study include intercoder variability, misclassification bias because of the data abstraction process, and prioritization of campaigns based on the proprietary GoFundMe algorithm.

Keywords: GoFundMe; crowdfunding; crowdsourcing; financial burden; fundraising; health equity; medical expenses; social media.

©Erica Mark, Mira Sridharan, Brian Florenzo, Olivia L Schenck, Mary-Margaret B Noland, John S Barbieri, Jules B Lipoff. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 22.04.2022.