In-office dispensing of oral targeted agents by urology practices in men with advanced prostate cancer
- PMID: 37643638
- PMCID: PMC10555918
- DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad062
In-office dispensing of oral targeted agents by urology practices in men with advanced prostate cancer
Abstract
Background: Management of men with advanced prostate cancer has evolved to include urologists, made possible by oral targeted agents (eg, abiraterone or enzalutamide) that can be dispensed directly to patients in the office. We sought to investigate whether this increasingly common model improves access to these agents, especially for Black men who are historically undertreated.
Methods: We used 20% national Medicare data to perform a retrospective cohort study of men with advanced prostate cancer from 2011 through 2019, managed by urology practices with and without in-office dispensing. Using a difference-in-difference framework, generalized estimating equations were used to measure the effect of in-office dispensing on prescriptions for abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, adjusting for differences between patients, including race.
Results: New prescription fills for oral targeted agents increased after the adoption of in-office dispensing (+4.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.4% to 5.4%) relative to that for men managed by practices without dispensing (+2.4%, 95% CI = 1.4% to 3.4%). The increase in the postintervention period (difference-in-difference estimate) was 2% higher (95% CI = 0.6% to 3.4%) for men managed by practices adopting dispensing relative to men managed by practices without dispensing. The effect was strongest for practices adopting dispensing in 2015 (difference-in-difference estimate: +4.2%, 95% CI = 2.3% to 6.2%). The effect of dispensing adoption did not differ by race.
Conclusion: Adoption of in-office dispensing by urology practices increased prescription fills for oral targeted agents in men with advanced prostate cancer. This model of delivery may improve access to this important class of medications.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have no conflicts of interests or disclosures.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of In-office Dispensing by Single-specialty Urology Practices on Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer.Urol Pract. 2023 May;10(3):230-235. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000390. Epub 2023 Jan 30. Urol Pract. 2023. PMID: 37103497 Free PMC article.
-
Physician Dispensing Among Urology Practices and the Use of Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 Mar 2;6(2):pkac023. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac023. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35603854 Free PMC article.
-
The immediate effects of private equity acquisition of urology practices on the management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer.Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(24):22325-22332. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6788. Epub 2023 Dec 15. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 38100144 Free PMC article.
-
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):467-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24321502 Review.
-
Cabazitaxel for Hormone-Relapsed Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Docetaxel-Containing Regimen: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Apr;35(4):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0457-1. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017. PMID: 27770303 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical