Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 2 biopsy: Do p16INK4a and Ki-67 biomarkers contribute to the decision to treat? A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 37646766
- PMCID: PMC10452003
- DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0527.R2.280423
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 2 biopsy: Do p16INK4a and Ki-67 biomarkers contribute to the decision to treat? A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Managing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) is challenging, considering the CIN2 regression rate, perinatal risks associated with excisional procedures, and insufficient well-established risk factors to predict progression.
Objectives: To determine the ability of p16INK4a and Ki-67 staining in biopsies diagnosed with CIN2 to identify patients with higher-grade lesions (CIN3 or carcinoma).
Design and setting: Cross-sectional study conducted at a referral center for treating uterine cervical lesions.
Methods: In 79 women, we analyzed the correlation of p16INK4a and Ki-67 expression in CIN2 biopsies with the presence of a higher-grade lesions, as determined via histopathology in surgical specimens from treated women or via two colposcopies and two cytological tests during follow-up for untreated women with at least a 6-month interval. The expression of these two biomarkers was verified by at least two independent pathologists and quantified using digital algorithms.
Results: Thirteen (16.8%) women with CIN2 biopsy exhibited higher-grade lesions on the surgical excision specimen or during follow-up. p16INK4a expression positively and negatively predicted the presence of higher-grade lesions in 17.19% and 86.67% patients, respectively. Ki-67 expression positively and negatively predicted the presence of higher-grade lesions in 40% and 88.24% patients, respectively.
Conclusions: Negative p16INK4a and Ki67 immunohistochemical staining can assure absence of a higher-grade lesion in more than 85% of patients with CIN2 biopsies and can be used to prevent overtreatment of these patients. Positive IHC staining for p16INK4a and Ki-67 did not predict CIN3 in patients with CIN2 biopsies.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Value of p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Staining in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 Biopsies as Biomarkers for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3 in Cone Results.Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol. 2016 Feb;38(1):1-8. Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol. 2016. PMID: 27363060
-
p16 Immunohistochemistry is useful in confirming high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in women with negative HPV testing.Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015 Mar;34(2):180-6. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000112. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015. PMID: 25675189
-
FAM19A4/miR124-2 Methylation Testing and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 Genotyping in HPV-Positive Women Under the Age of 30 Years.Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e827-e834. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac433. Clin Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 35686306 Free PMC article.
-
Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 to detect high-grade cervical lesions: Results from the Screening Triage Ascertaining Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Immunostain Testing study.Int J Cancer. 2021 Jan 15;148(2):492-501. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33250. Epub 2020 Aug 24. Int J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 32781481
-
Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29740819 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva . Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Divisão de Detecção Precoce e Apoio à Organização de Rede. Brazilian Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2016. [Accessed in 2023 (Jan 30)]. Available from: https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files/media/document/di... .
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
