Efficacy of commercial peroxyacetic acid on Vibrio parahaemolyticus planktonic cells and biofilms on stainless steel and Greenshell™ mussel (Perna canaliculus) surfaces
- PMID: 37672942
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110372
Efficacy of commercial peroxyacetic acid on Vibrio parahaemolyticus planktonic cells and biofilms on stainless steel and Greenshell™ mussel (Perna canaliculus) surfaces
Abstract
The potential of using commercial peroxyacetic acid (PAA) for Vibrio parahaemolyticus sanitization was evaluated. Commercial PAA of 0.005 % (v/v, PAA: 2.24 mg/L, hydrogen peroxide: 11.79 mg/L) resulted in a planktonic cell reduction of >7.00 log10 CFU/mL when initial V. parahaemolyticus cells averaged 7.64 log10 CFU/mL. For cells on stainless steel coupons, treatment of 0.02 % PAA (v/v, PAA: 8.96 mg/L, hydrogen peroxide: 47.16 mg/L) achieved >5.00 log10 CFU/cm2 reductions in biofilm cells for eight strains but not for the two strongest biofilm formers. PAA of 0.05 % (v/v, PAA: 22.39 mg/L, hydrogen peroxide: 117.91 mg/L) was required to inactivate >5.00 log10 CFU/cm2 biofilm cells from mussel shell surfaces. The detection of PAA residues after biofilm treatment demonstrated that higher biofilm production resulted in higher PAA residues (p < 0.05), suggesting biofilm is acting as a barrier interfering with PAA diffusing into the matrices. Based on the comparative analysis of genomes, robust biofilm formation and metabolic heterogeneity within niches might have contributed to the variations in PAA resistance of V. parahaemolyticus biofilms.
Keywords: Greenshell™ mussel; PAA; Sanitizer; Seafood safety; Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing financial interests or personal relationships.
Similar articles
-
Effect of plasma-activated water on planktonic and biofilm cells of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated from cutting board surfaces in retail seafood markets.J Appl Microbiol. 2024 Aug 5;135(8):lxae182. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxae182. J Appl Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39020257
-
Molecular response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to the sanitizer peracetic acid.Int J Food Microbiol. 2018 Dec 2;286:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 8. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018. PMID: 30099282
-
Biofilm formation, sodium hypochlorite susceptibility and genetic diversity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.Int J Food Microbiol. 2023 Jan 16;385:110011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.110011. Epub 2022 Nov 8. Int J Food Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 36370527
-
Inhibitory effects of lactobionic acid on Vibrio parahaemolyticus planktonic cells and biofilms.Food Microbiol. 2022 May;103:103963. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2021.103963. Epub 2021 Dec 8. Food Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35082080
-
Targeted phytogenic compounds against Vibrio parahaemolyticus biofilms.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2025;65(9):1761-1772. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2023.2299949. Epub 2024 Jan 8. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2025. PMID: 38189321 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
