Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2333182.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33182.

Phosphatidylethanol vs Transdermal Alcohol Monitoring for Detecting Alcohol Consumption Among Adults

Affiliations

Phosphatidylethanol vs Transdermal Alcohol Monitoring for Detecting Alcohol Consumption Among Adults

Judith A Hahn et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Alcohol biomarkers can improve detection of heavy alcohol use in clinical care, yet cutoffs for phosphatidylethanol (PEth), a blood biomarker, have not been established.

Objective: To determine the optimal cutoff for PEth for heavy alcohol consumption in a study of middle-age and older adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a 4-week diagnostic study of adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and current alcohol consumption, recruited from general cardiology and cardiac electrophysiology outpatient clinics from September 2014 to September 2019. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022.

Main outcomes and measures: The main aim was to determine the optimal PEth cutoff for heavy alcohol consumption, using the Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) to measure transdermal alcohol. Area under the curve (AUC) for PEth-detected compared with SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption in any week over the prior 4 weeks (ie, ≥3 [women] and ≥4 [men] episodes) or any estimated breath alcohol of 0.08% or greater in any week, and the PEth cutoff was calculated using the Youden J statistic. Similar analyses were conducted comparing PEth with individual drinks reported by pressing an event monitor, retrospective self-report via the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C), and using 2-week look-backs.

Results: In this diagnostic study of 64 patients with both PEth and SCRAM measures over 4 weeks (54 [84.4%] men; mean age, 65.5 [95% CI, 62.6-68.5] years; 51 [79.7%] White), 31 (48.4%) had any SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption over the 4 weeks, and the median (IQR) PEth at 4 weeks was 23 ng/mL (<limit of quantification to 60 ng/mL). The AUC for PEth vs any SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93). The optimal PEth cutoff was 18.5 ng/mL (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.93), with sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI, 66.3%-94.5%) and specificity of 72.7% (95% CI, 54.5%-86.7%). The PEth test characteristics by individual drink reporting using the event monitors and by the AUDIT-C, and by these measures and by SCRAM collected for 2-week intervals, were similar to those compared with the 4-week SCRAM.

Conclusions and relevance: In a predominately middle-age and older White male population, PEth compared well with SCRAM. A PEth cutoff of 18.5 ng/mL (or rounded to 20 ng/mL, a recommended PEth cutoff for significant alcohol consumption) can be used in clinical care to detect heavy alcohol consumption in middle-age and older men.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Hahn reported receiving consulting fees from Pear Therapeutics outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve for Phosphatidylethanol vs Heavy Alcohol Consumption Measured by Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM), Event Monitoring, and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT-C)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Esser MB, Sherk A, Liu Y, et al. . Deaths and years of potential life lost from excessive alcohol use: United States, 2011-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(39):1428-1433. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6939a6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Drinking levels defined. Accessed July 1, 2016. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/mo...
    1. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, et al. ; US Preventive Services Task Force . Screening and behavioral counseling interventions to reduce unhealthy alcohol use in adolescents and adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;320(18):1899-1909. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.16789 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mintz CM, Hartz SM, Fisher SL, et al. . A cascade of care for alcohol use disorder: using 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data to identify gaps in past 12-month care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021;45(6):1276-1286. doi:10.1111/acer.14609 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romero-Rodríguez E, Fuster D, Pérula de Torres LÁ, Saitz R. Is clinicians’ alcohol consumption associated with their preventive practices to reduce unhealthy alcohol use? a systematic review of current evidence. Alcohol (Hanover). 2023;47(1):7-17. doi:10.1111/acer.14962 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types