Long short-term memory model identifies ARDS and in-hospital mortality in both non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohort
- PMID: 37709302
- PMCID: PMC10503386
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100782
Long short-term memory model identifies ARDS and in-hospital mortality in both non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohort
Abstract
Objective: To identify the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in-hospital mortality using long short-term memory (LSTM) framework in a mechanically ventilated (MV) non-COVID-19 cohort and a COVID-19 cohort.
Methods: We included MV ICU patients between 2017 and 2018 and reviewed patient records for ARDS and death. Using active learning, we enriched this cohort with MV patients from 2016 to 2019 (MV non-COVID-19, n=3905). We collected a second validation cohort of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in 2020 (COVID+, n=5672). We trained an LSTM model using 132 structured features on the MV non-COVID-19 training cohort and validated on the MV non-COVID-19 validation and COVID-19 cohorts.
Results: Applying LSTM (model score 0.9) on the MV non-COVID-19 validation cohort had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 57%. The model identified the risk of ARDS 10 hours before ARDS and 9.4 days before death. The sensitivity (70%) and specificity (84%) of the model on the COVID-19 cohort are lower than MV non-COVID-19 cohort. For the COVID-19 + cohort and MV COVID-19 + patients, the model identified the risk of in-hospital mortality 2.4 days and 1.54 days before death, respectively.
Discussion: Our LSTM algorithm accurately and timely identified the risk of ARDS or death in MV non-COVID-19 and COVID+ patients. By alerting the risk of ARDS or death, we can improve the implementation of evidence-based ARDS management and facilitate goals-of-care discussions in high-risk patients.
Conclusion: Using the LSTM algorithm in hospitalised patients identifies the risk of ARDS or death.
Keywords: COVID-19; Critical Care Outcomes; Decision Support Systems, Clinical; Medical Informatics.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Adherence to protective mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: Comparison between two prospective cohorts.Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023 Aug;47(8):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 30. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023. PMID: 36813658
-
Metabolic Syndrome and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2140568. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40568. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34935924 Free PMC article.
-
Limitations of the ARDS criteria during high-flow oxygen or non-invasive ventilation: evidence from critically ill COVID-19 patients.Crit Care. 2022 Mar 7;26(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03933-1. Crit Care. 2022. PMID: 35255949 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study.Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jan;47(1):60-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06294-x. Epub 2020 Oct 29. Intensive Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33211135 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical ventilation parameters in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a scoping review.Crit Care. 2021 Mar 20;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03536-2. Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 33743812 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical