Tele-Neuropsychology: From Science to Policy to Practice

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb 19;39(2):227-248. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acad066.

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this paper is to accelerate the number of randomized experimental studies of the reliability and validity in-home tele-neuropsychological testing (tele-np-t).

Method: We conducted a critical review of the tele-neuropsychology literature. We discuss this research in the context of the United States' public and private healthcare payer systems, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding system's telehealth lists, and existing disparities in healthcare access.

Results: The number of tele-np publications has been stagnant since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. There are less published experimental studies of tele-neuropsychology (tele-np), and particularly in-home tele-np-t, than other tele-np publications. There is strong foundational evidence of the acceptability, feasibility, and reliability of tele-np-t, but relatively few studies of the reliability and validity of in-home tele-np-t using randomization methodology.

Conclusions: More studies of the reliability and validity of in-home tele-np-t using randomization methodology are necessary to support inclusion of tele-np-t codes on the CMS and CPT telehealth lists, and subsequently, the integration and delivery of in-home tele-np-t services across providers and institutions. These actions are needed to maintain equitable reimbursement of in-home tele-np-t services and address the widespread disparities in healthcare access.

Keywords: Billing and reimbursement; Current procedural terminology; Health disparities; Healthcare access; Tele-neuropsychology; Telehealth.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Humans
  • Medicare
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Neuropsychology* / methods
  • Pandemics*
  • Policy
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • United States