Clinical Significance of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast Cancer Risk Stratification

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 May;59(5):1742-1757. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29015. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

Abstract

Background: Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is an established breast cancer risk factor. However, the relationship between BPE levels and breast cancer risk stratification remains unclear.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical relationship between BPE levels and breast cancer risk with covariate adjustments for age, ethnicity, and hormonal status.

Study type: Retrospective.

Population: 954 screening breast MRI datasets representing 721 women divided into four cohorts: women with pathogenic germline breast cancer (BRCA) mutations (Group 1, N = 211), women with non-BRCA germline mutations (Group 2, N = 60), women without high-risk germline mutations but with a lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥20% using the Tyrer-Cuzick model (Group 3, N = 362), and women with <20% lifetime risk (Group 4, N = 88).

Field strength/sequence: 3 T/axial non-fat-saturated T1, short tau inversion recovery, fat-saturated pre-contrast, and post-contrast T1-weighted images.

Assessment: Data on age, body mass index, ethnicity, menopausal status, genetic predisposition, and hormonal therapy use were collected. BPE levels were evaluated by two breast fellowship-trained radiologists independently in accordance with BI-RADS, with a third breast fellowship-trained radiologist resolving any discordance.

Statistical tests: Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to adjust covariates, including age, ethnicity, menopausal status, hormonal treatments, and prior bilateral oophorectomy. The Mann-Whitney U test, chi-squared test, and univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed, with an odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval. Weighted Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-reader variation. A P value <0.05 indicated a significant result.

Results: In the assessment of BPE, there was substantial agreement between the two interpreting radiologists (κ = 0.74). Patient demographics were not significantly different between patient groups after PSM. The BPE of Group 1 was significantly lower than that of Group 4 and Group 3 among premenopausal women. In estimating the BPE level, the OR of gene mutations was 0.35.

Data conclusion: Adjusting for potential confounders, the BPE level of premenopausal women with BRCA mutations was significantly lower than that of non-high-risk women.

Level of evidence: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Keywords: BRCA; background parenchymal enhancement (BPE); breast MRI; high‐risk screening; lifetime risk.

MeSH terms

  • Breast / diagnostic imaging
  • Breast / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Breast Neoplasms* / genetics
  • Breast Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Clinical Relevance
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment

Grants and funding