Comparative analysis of hypomethylating agents as maintenance therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute leukemia

Leuk Lymphoma. 2023 Dec;64(13):2113-2122. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2252948. Epub 2023 Dec 23.

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 136 consecutive patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at our center. Among them, 76 cases used hypomethylating agents (decitabine, n = 40; azacitidine, n = 36) as post-transplant maintenance therapy, whereas 60 contemporaneous patients did not adopt maintenance therapy. The 3-year incidences of relapse in two groups were 16.6% and 39.2% (p = .001). The 3-year OS and DFS in maintenance group were 84.0% and 78.6%, which were remarkably improved than in control group (60.0% and 58.0%) (p = .004, p = .011). Moreover, the 3-year relapse rates for patients receiving decitabine and azacitidine therapy were 8.5% and 25.0%, respectively (p = .019). Patients utilizing decitabine had more common possibility of grade 3-4 neutropenia than azacitidine (20.0% vs. 2.8%, p = .031). These results indicate that maintenance therapies using hypomethylating agents could reduce the risk of post-transplant recurrence, resulting into remarkable superior survival. Decitabine might lower relapse after allo-HSCT with somewhat more severe myelosuppression when being compared to azacitidine.

Keywords: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; azacitidine; decitabine; maintenance therapy; relapse.

MeSH terms

  • Azacitidine / adverse effects
  • Decitabine / therapeutic use
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation* / adverse effects
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation* / methods
  • Humans
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute* / genetics
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute* / therapy
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes*
  • Recurrence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Transplantation, Homologous

Substances

  • Decitabine
  • Azacitidine