Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;59(2):e14228.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14228. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

The consequences of firm scope and scale on patient access to healthcare

Affiliations

The consequences of firm scope and scale on patient access to healthcare

Giacomo Meille et al. Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to quantify changes in the market structure of primary care physicians and examine its relationship with access to care.

Data sources and study setting: We created measures of market structure from a 5% sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims and examined access to care using nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Our study spanned from 2008 to 2019.

Study design: We used a linear probability model to estimate the relationship between access to care and two measures of market structure: concentration, measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), and vertical integration, measured by the market share of multispecialty firms. Our model controlled for year and ZIP code fixed effects, respondents' demographics and health status, and other measures of market structure.

Data collection/extraction methods: All adult respondents in the MEPS were included.

Principal findings: The percentage of people living in concentrated ZIP codes (HHI above 1500) increased from 37% in 2008 to 53% in 2019. During the same period, the median market share of multispecialty firms rose from 30% to 48%. Respondents in highly concentrated ZIP codes (HHI over 2500) were 5.9 percentage points (95% CI: -1.4 to -10.4) less likely to report having access to immediate care than respondents in unconcentrated ZIP codes. The association was largest among Medicaid beneficiaries, a 17.3 percentage point reduction (95% CI: -5.1 to -29.4). When we applied a model that was robust to biases from treatments with staggered timing, the estimated association remained negative but was not statistically significant. We found no association between HHI and indicators for having a usual source of care and annual checkups. The multispecialty market share was negatively associated with checkups, but not other measures of access.

Conclusions: Increases in concentration may reduce some types of access to healthcare. These effects appear most pronounced among Medicaid beneficiaries.

Keywords: healthcare access; provider concentration; provider integration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have conflicts of interest to report.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kane CK. Recent changes in physician practice arrangements: private practice dropped to less than 50 percent of physicians in 2020. Policy Research Perspectives. American Medical Association; 2021.
    1. Fulton BD. Health care market concentration trends In the United States: evidence and policy responses. Health Aff. 2017;36(9):1530‐1538. - PubMed
    1. Koch TG, Wendling BW, Wilson NE. How vertical integration affects the quantity and cost of care for Medicare beneficiaries. J Health Econ. 2017;52:19‐32. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine . Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. The National Academies Press; 2003:780. - PubMed
    1. Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health. 2015;129(6):611‐620. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources