First-Pass Success of Intubations Using Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Children With Limited Neck Mobility
- PMID: 37751531
- DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003058
First-Pass Success of Intubations Using Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Children With Limited Neck Mobility
Abstract
Objective: It is not clear whether video laryngoscopy (VL) is associated with a higher first-pass success rate in pediatric patients with limited neck mobility when compared with direct laryngoscopy (DL). We sought to determine the association between the laryngoscopy method and first-pass success.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined intubation data extracted from 2 prospectively collected, multicenter, airway management safety databases (National Emergency Airway Registry and the National Emergency Airway Registry for children), obtained during the years 2013-2018 in the emergency department. Intubations were included if patients were aged younger than 18 and had limited neck mobility. We compared first-pass success rates for ED intubations that were performed using VL versus DL. We built a structural causal model to account for potential confounders such as age, disease category (medical or trauma condition), other difficult airway characteristics, use of sedatives/paralytics, and laryngoscopist training level. We also analyzed adverse events as a secondary outcome.
Results: Of 34,239 intubations (19,071 in the National Emergency Airway Registry and 15,168 in the National Emergency Airway Registry for children), a total of 341 intubations (1.0%) met inclusion criteria; 168 were performed via VL and 173 were performed via DL. The median age of patients was 124 months (interquartile range, 48-204). There was no difference in first-pass success between VL and DL (79.8% vs 75.7%, P = 0.44). Video laryngoscopy was not associated with higher first-pass success (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.47, with DL as a comparator) when a structural causal model was used to account for confounders. There was no difference in the adverse events between VL and DL groups (13.7% vs 8.7%, P = 0.19).
Conclusion: In children with limited neck mobility receiving tracheal intubation in the ED, neither VL nor DL was associated with a higher first-pass success rate.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Video Versus Direct and Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Tracheal Intubations.Acad Emerg Med. 2020 May;27(5):394-402. doi: 10.1111/acem.13869. Epub 2019 Nov 7. Acad Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 31617640
-
Video Laryngoscopy Is Associated With First-Pass Success in Emergency Department Intubations for Trauma Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry.Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;78(6):708-719. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.07.115. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Ann Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34417072
-
Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;27(2):100-108. doi: 10.1111/acem.13851. Epub 2020 Jan 20. Acad Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 31957174
-
Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;24(8):1018-1026. doi: 10.1111/acem.13193. Epub 2017 Jul 25. Acad Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28370736 Review.
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4:CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3. PMID: 27844477 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Endotracheal Intubation Outside the Operating Room: Year in Review 2023.Respir Care. 2024 Aug 24;69(9):1165-1181. doi: 10.4187/respcare.12014. Respir Care. 2024. PMID: 38744479 Review.
References
-
- Redel A, Karademir F, Schlitterlau A, et al. Validation of the GlideScope video laryngoscope in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth . 2009;19:667–671.
-
- Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, et al. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth . 2009;102:546–550.
-
- Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Baidya DK. A comparison between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth . 2018;47:21–26.
-
- Sakles JC, Patanwala AE, Mosier JM, et al. Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med . 2014;9:93–98.
-
- Kaji AH, Shover C, Lee J, et al. Video versus direct and augmented direct laryngoscopy in pediatric tracheal intubations. Acad Emerg Med . 2020;27:394–402.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
