Enhancing Food Literacy and Food Security through School Gardening in Rural and Regional Communities

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;20(18):6794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186794.

Abstract

A qualitative case study approach with in-depth, semi-structured interviews of key school staff, and student feedback was used to assess a school kitchen and garden program in the regional area of North-West Tasmania, Australia. A detailed program description was produced to conduct a realist evaluation with a Context-Mechanism-Outcome configuration, followed by a program theory evaluation through the construction of a retrospective program logic model. Dedicated kitchen and garden spaces, knowledgeable teachers committed to the program, provision of sufficient materials and consumables, and support from the school and community were found to be the basic requirements to establish a program. Additionally, it is essential to integrate both the kitchen and garden teaching components into the school curriculum. The positive outcomes (e.g., engagement, participation, knowledge, skills, behavioral change) of the program were dependent on the underlying factors, including dedicated support of school leadership, teaching staff, and the parent body for effective student engagement in the teaching spaces and for wider engagement from families and the community. The students' feedback provided supporting evidence of increased food literacy with improvements in their understanding, abilities, and attitudes towards gardening, producing healthy food, and preparing food. This may further lead to enhanced food security for students' families and the broader community.

Keywords: child health; experiential learning; food literacy; food security; nutrition; rural health; school gardens.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Food
  • Gardening*
  • Humans
  • Literacy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Schools

Grants and funding

This research was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grant (#113672) as part of the CAPITOL Project. The study funder had no role in study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, in writing the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication. The contents of this article are the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of the NHMRC.