Machine-learning-based prediction of fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention

Atherosclerosis. 2023 Oct:383:117310. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.117310. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

Abstract

Background and aims: Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) reflects residual atherosclerotic burden and is associated with future events. How much post-PCI FFR can be predicted based on baseline basic information and the clinical relevance have not been investigated.

Methods: We compiled a multicenter registry of patients undergoing pre- and post-PCI FFR. Machine-learning (ML) algorithms were designed to predict post-PCI FFR levels from baseline demographics, quantitative coronary angiography, and pre-PCI FFR. FFR deviation was defined as actual minus ML-predicted post-PCI FFR levels, and its association with incident target vessel failure (TVF) was evaluated.

Results: Median (IQR) pre- and post-PCI FFR values were 0.71 (0.61, 0.77) and 0.88 (0.84, 0.93), respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient of the actual and predicted post-PCI FFR was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.57). FFR deviation was non-linearly associated with incident TVF (HR [95% CI] with Q3 as reference: 1.65 [1.14, 2.39] in Q1, 1.42 [0.98, 2.08] in Q2, 0.81 [0.53, 1.26] in Q4, and 1.04 [0.69, 1.56] in Q5). A model with polynomial function of continuous FFR deviation indicated increasing TVF risk for FFR deviation ≤0 but plateau risk with FFR deviation >0.

Conclusions: An ML-based algorithm using baseline data moderately predicted post-PCI FFR. The deviation of post-PCI FFR from the predicted value was associated with higher vessel-oriented event.

Keywords: Fractional flow reserve; Machine-learning; Percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Artery Disease* / diagnosis
  • Coronary Artery Disease* / therapy
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial*
  • Humans
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Treatment Outcome