Arthroscopic knots: Suture and knot characterisation of modern polyblend suture materials

Earle Savage; Christopher J Hurren; Gayathri Devi Rajmohan; William Thomas; Richard S Page

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19391

Arthroscopic knots: Suture and knot characterisation of modern polyblend suture materials

Heliyon. 2023 Aug 25;9(9):e19391. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19391. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Authors

Earle Savage¹, Christopher J Hurren², Gayathri Devi Rajmohan², William Thomas³, Richard S Page^{1

4}

Affiliations

¹ Barwon Centre of Orthopaedic Research and Education, Barwon Health and St John of God Hospital, Geelong, Australia.
² Deakin University, Institute for Frontier Materials, Geelong, Australia.
³ Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Devon, UK.
⁴ Deakin University, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia.

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the biophysical structure and function of modern suture materials. Particularly the suture's ability to withstand the stressors of surgery and how the material properties affect knot stability. The secondary aim was to investigate the effect that different knots have on the suture material itself. This study builds on previous research assessing suture and knot characteristics but in modern Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) materials currently in widespread clinical use in arthroscopic surgery.

Methods: Three common UHMWPE sutures and one polyester suture were tested in both a dry and wet state using the Geelong, Nicky's, Surgeon's and Tautline knots. Tensile strength of knots was tested vertically at a 60 mm/min strain rate and 45 mm gauge length. Sutures were tied through a cannula around two 8 mm diameter circular bollards. Testing was conducted in a controlled environment temperature and humidity environment (20 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 2%).

Results: No one knot type was optimal over all suture types. Mean tensile strength in both a dry and wet state and a low coefficient of variation (CV) in tensile strength in a wet state were considered as an indication of suitability. With Ethibond sutures this was the Geelong knot (CV:4.2%). With Orthocord sutures both the Geelong and Tautline knots (CV:4.2% and CV:11.9% respectively). With FiberWire sutures the Nickys and Tautline knots (CV:22.6% and CV:22.5% respectively). With ForceFiber sutures all four knots exhibited similar wet tensile strength with high variability showing that all should perform in a similar way invivo.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates a statistically significant three-way interaction between polyblend suture materials, the knot and the environment. This has implications for knot security using the tested sutures in different environments, as one knot may not behave the same under all conditions.

Keywords: Arthroscopic knots characterisation; Contemporary UHMWPE suture; Knots; Suture and knot characterisation and orthopaedic surgery; Tensile strength of knots.